These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14999243)

  • 1. In no one's best interest.
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6978):1. PubMed ID: 14999243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Media attack prompts editorial backlash against MMR study.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6977):765. PubMed ID: 14985719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Don't shoot the messenger.
    New Sci; 2006 Jun 17-23; 190(2556):5. PubMed ID: 16862721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A statement by the editors of The Lancet.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):820-1. PubMed ID: 15022645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What conflict of interest?
    Chew M
    Med J Aust; 2004 Jul; 181(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 15233601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MMR controversy raises questions about publication ethics.
    Fleck F
    Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Apr; 82(4):311-2. PubMed ID: 15296362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A statement by Professor John Walker-Smith.
    Walker-Smith J
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):822-3. PubMed ID: 15022649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Texas court dismisses defamation case brought by Andrew Wakefield against The BMJ.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g5998. PubMed ID: 25288504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A statement by Dr Simon Murch. Allegations concerning our 1998 study.
    Murch S
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):821-2. PubMed ID: 15022648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Editor in the eye of a storm.
    Lyall J
    BMJ; 2004 Feb; 328(7438):528. PubMed ID: 15164721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Truth and health consequences.
    Ratzan SC
    J Health Commun; 2004; 9(4):279-80. PubMed ID: 15371082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A statement by Dr Andrew Wakefield.
    Wakefield A
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):823-4. PubMed ID: 15022650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MMR--responding to retraction.
    Wakefield AJ; Harvey P; Linnell J
    Lancet; 2004 Apr; 363(9417):1327-8; discussion 1328. PubMed ID: 15094289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assuring research integrity in the wake of Wakefield.
    Opel DJ; Diekema DS; Marcuse EK
    BMJ; 2011 Jan; 342():d2. PubMed ID: 21245120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why did the Lancet take so long?
    Greenhalgh T
    BMJ; 2010 Feb; 340():c644. PubMed ID: 20124363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A statement by The Royal Free and University College Medical School and The Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust.
    Hodgson H
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):824. PubMed ID: 15022651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lancet retracts Wakefield's MMR paper.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2010 Feb; 340():c696. PubMed ID: 20124366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomy of a scare.
    Begley S
    Newsweek; 2009 Mar; 153(9):42-7. PubMed ID: 19413010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Institutional research and biomedical journals: Poor quality articles and honest researchers!
    Maisonneuve H; Slim K
    J Visc Surg; 2015 Nov; 152(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 26476677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The lessons of MMR.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):747-9. PubMed ID: 15016482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.