BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14999250)

  • 1. US and biologists wary of strict biotech rules.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6978):6. PubMed ID: 14999250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. European Parliament vote encourages industry to proclaim green biotech.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):756-7. PubMed ID: 12147985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Caution: may be harmless if swallowed.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):753. PubMed ID: 12147982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Divisions sink US consensus effort on transgenic food.
    Knight J
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):574. PubMed ID: 12789300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US launches probe into sales of unapproved transgenic corn.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):423. PubMed ID: 15791213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biotech crop rules get rewrite.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):9. PubMed ID: 17805261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The emperor's new clones.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):1. PubMed ID: 17211372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Europe angers US with strict GM labeling.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 12511897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Political will to lift the GMO moratorium emerging in Europe.
    Meldolesi A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):758-9. PubMed ID: 12147986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Labs cook up strategy to test transgenic food.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2002 Dec; 420(6916):596. PubMed ID: 12478253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US, EU prepare for further biotech food dispute.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):897. PubMed ID: 11581641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trade war: what is it good for?
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6938):367. PubMed ID: 12761506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concern about Japan's unclear biotech regulations.
    Watanabe KN
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tougher rules aim to prevent gene flow into crops.
    Hoag H
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):103. PubMed ID: 12634744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The international regulation of genetically modified organisms: importing caution into the U.S. food supply.
    Strauss DM
    Food Drug Law J; 2006; 61(2):167-96. PubMed ID: 16903028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Africa hungry for conventional food as biotech row drags on.
    McDowell N
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):571-2. PubMed ID: 12167818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biotechnology. Agricultural researchers rattled by demands for documents.
    Kloor K
    Science; 2015 Feb; 347(6223):699. PubMed ID: 25678635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biotech crops' seal of safety does not convince skeptics.
    Keogh B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Apr; 104(7):498-501. PubMed ID: 22440678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.