These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14999372)
1. [Primary rotatory stability of robot-assisted and manually implanted hip endoprosthesis stems]. Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J Unfallchirurg; 2004 Apr; 107(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 14999372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Primary rotatory stability of hip endoprostheses stems after manual and robot assisted implantation]. Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15250002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The dimensional accuracy for preparation of the femoral cavity in HIP arthroplasty. A comparison between manual- and robot-assisted implantation of hip endoprosthesis stems in cadaver femurs. Prymka M; Wu L; Hahne HJ; Koebke J; Hassenpflug J Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jan; 126(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16341537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The primary stability between manual and robot assisted implantation of hip prostheses: A biomechanical study on synthetic femurs]. Decking J; Gerber A; Kränzlein J; Meurer A; Böhm B; Plitz W Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15250003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A semi-active milling procedure in view of preparing implantation beds in robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Van Ham G; Denis K; Vander Sloten J; Van Audekercke R; Van der Perre G; De Schutter J; Simon JP; Fabry G Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 May; 219(3):163-74. PubMed ID: 15934392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary stability of a robodoc implanted anatomical stem versus manual implantation. Nogler M; Polikeit A; Wimmer C; Brückner A; Ferguson SJ; Krismer M Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Feb; 19(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 14967574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures. Schulz AP; Seide K; Queitsch C; von Haugwitz A; Meiners J; Kienast B; Tarabolsi M; Kammal M; Jürgens C Int J Med Robot; 2007 Dec; 3(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 18000945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The importance to generate robot-assisted milled cavities for total hip replacement. A comparative experimental study: manual versus robotic preparation]. Thomsen M; Aldinger P; Görtz W; Lukoschek M; Lahmer A; Honl M; Birke A; Nägerl H; Ewerbeck V Unfallchirurg; 2001 Aug; 104(8):692-9. PubMed ID: 11569150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Dislocated fracture of the lesser trochanter with malrotation of the stem after robot assisted implantation of a cementless hip prosthesis: a casuistic report]. Prymka M; Hassenpflug J Unfallchirurg; 2003 Aug; 106(8):671-5. PubMed ID: 12955238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical outcome, 6 years after robot assisted hip endoprostheses implantation--a prospective study]. Prymka M; Hassenpflug J Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 20183744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can the rasp be used to predict intra-operatively the primary stability that can be achieved by press-fitting the stem in cementless hip arthroplasty? Varini E; Cristofolini L; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 May; 23(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 18068878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of manual rasping and robotic milling for short metaphyseal-fitting stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Lim SJ; Kim SM; Lim BH; Moon YW; Park YS Comput Aided Surg; 2013; 18(1-2):33-40. PubMed ID: 23253159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Device to measure intra-operatively the primary stability of cementless hip stems. Cristofolini L; Varini E; Pelgreffi I; Cappello A; Toni A Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jun; 28(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16144768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Wu LD; Hahne HJ; Hassenpflug J J Zhejiang Univ Sci; 2004 Oct; 5(10):1270-8. PubMed ID: 15362200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with a short femoral stem: a prospective randomized short-term outcome study. Lim SJ; Ko KR; Park CW; Moon YW; Park YS Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 26291307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The importance of adequate stem anteversion for rotational stability in cemented total hip replacement: a radiostereometric study with ten-year follow-up. Kiernan S; Hermann KL; Wagner P; Ryd L; Flivik G Bone Joint J; 2013 Jan; 95-B(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 23307669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer assisted implantation of the femoral stem in THA - an experimental study. Jerosch J; Peuker E; von Hasselbach C; Lahmer A; Filler T; Witzel U Int Orthop; 1999; 23(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 10591940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The compression-rotation stem: an experimental study on the primary stability of a new revision hip stem. Kraenzlein J; Mazoochian F; Fottner A; Birkenmaier C; von Schulze Pellengahr C; Jansson V Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jan; 223(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 19239066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Geometric accuracy in robot-assisted total hip replacement surgery. Schneider J; Kalender W Comput Aided Surg; 2003; 8(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 15253366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]