111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14999372)
1. [Primary rotatory stability of robot-assisted and manually implanted hip endoprosthesis stems].
Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J
Unfallchirurg; 2004 Apr; 107(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 14999372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Primary rotatory stability of hip endoprostheses stems after manual and robot assisted implantation].
Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15250002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The dimensional accuracy for preparation of the femoral cavity in HIP arthroplasty. A comparison between manual- and robot-assisted implantation of hip endoprosthesis stems in cadaver femurs.
Prymka M; Wu L; Hahne HJ; Koebke J; Hassenpflug J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jan; 126(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16341537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The primary stability between manual and robot assisted implantation of hip prostheses: A biomechanical study on synthetic femurs].
Decking J; Gerber A; Kränzlein J; Meurer A; Böhm B; Plitz W
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15250003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A semi-active milling procedure in view of preparing implantation beds in robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery.
Van Ham G; Denis K; Vander Sloten J; Van Audekercke R; Van der Perre G; De Schutter J; Simon JP; Fabry G
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 May; 219(3):163-74. PubMed ID: 15934392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary stability of a robodoc implanted anatomical stem versus manual implantation.
Nogler M; Polikeit A; Wimmer C; Brückner A; Ferguson SJ; Krismer M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Feb; 19(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 14967574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures.
Schulz AP; Seide K; Queitsch C; von Haugwitz A; Meiners J; Kienast B; Tarabolsi M; Kammal M; Jürgens C
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Dec; 3(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 18000945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The importance to generate robot-assisted milled cavities for total hip replacement. A comparative experimental study: manual versus robotic preparation].
Thomsen M; Aldinger P; Görtz W; Lukoschek M; Lahmer A; Honl M; Birke A; Nägerl H; Ewerbeck V
Unfallchirurg; 2001 Aug; 104(8):692-9. PubMed ID: 11569150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Dislocated fracture of the lesser trochanter with malrotation of the stem after robot assisted implantation of a cementless hip prosthesis: a casuistic report].
Prymka M; Hassenpflug J
Unfallchirurg; 2003 Aug; 106(8):671-5. PubMed ID: 12955238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical outcome, 6 years after robot assisted hip endoprostheses implantation--a prospective study].
Prymka M; Hassenpflug J
Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 20183744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can the rasp be used to predict intra-operatively the primary stability that can be achieved by press-fitting the stem in cementless hip arthroplasty?
Varini E; Cristofolini L; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 18068878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of manual rasping and robotic milling for short metaphyseal-fitting stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
Lim SJ; Kim SM; Lim BH; Moon YW; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2013; 18(1-2):33-40. PubMed ID: 23253159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Device to measure intra-operatively the primary stability of cementless hip stems.
Cristofolini L; Varini E; Pelgreffi I; Cappello A; Toni A
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jun; 28(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16144768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT-based accuracy of implanting custom-made endoprostheses.
Götze C; Vieth V; Meier N; Böttner F; Steinbeck J; Hackenberg L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):856-62. PubMed ID: 16023274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Wu LD; Hahne HJ; Hassenpflug J
J Zhejiang Univ Sci; 2004 Oct; 5(10):1270-8. PubMed ID: 15362200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with a short femoral stem: a prospective randomized short-term outcome study.
Lim SJ; Ko KR; Park CW; Moon YW; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 26291307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The importance of adequate stem anteversion for rotational stability in cemented total hip replacement: a radiostereometric study with ten-year follow-up.
Kiernan S; Hermann KL; Wagner P; Ryd L; Flivik G
Bone Joint J; 2013 Jan; 95-B(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 23307669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer assisted implantation of the femoral stem in THA - an experimental study.
Jerosch J; Peuker E; von Hasselbach C; Lahmer A; Filler T; Witzel U
Int Orthop; 1999; 23(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 10591940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The compression-rotation stem: an experimental study on the primary stability of a new revision hip stem.
Kraenzlein J; Mazoochian F; Fottner A; Birkenmaier C; von Schulze Pellengahr C; Jansson V
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jan; 223(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 19239066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Geometric accuracy in robot-assisted total hip replacement surgery.
Schneider J; Kalender W
Comput Aided Surg; 2003; 8(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 15253366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
