218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14999576)
1. Communication assessment using the common ground instrument: psychometric properties.
Lang F; McCord R; Harvill L; Anderson DS
Fam Med; 2004 Mar; 36(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 14999576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing students' communication skills: validation of a global rating.
Scheffer S; Muehlinghaus I; Froehmel A; Ortwein H
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 17636371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LUCAS: a theoretically informed instrument to assess clinical communication in objective structured clinical examinations.
Huntley CD; Salmon P; Fisher PL; Fletcher I; Young B
Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 22324526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Global clinical performance rating, reliability and validity in an undergraduate clerkship.
Daelmans HE; van der Hem-Stokroos HH; Hoogenboom RJ; Scherpbier AJ; Stehouwer CD; van der Vleuten CP
Neth J Med; 2005; 63(7):279-84. PubMed ID: 16093582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trained lay observers can reliably assess medical students' communication skills.
Bergus GR; Woodhead JC; Kreiter CD
Med Educ; 2009 Jul; 43(7):688-94. PubMed ID: 19573193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Communication skills in standardized-patient assessment of final-year medical students: a psychometric study.
Guiton G; Hodgson CS; Delandshere G; Wilkerson L
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 15316269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity testing of an evidence-based medicine OSCE station.
Tudiver F; Rose D; Banks B; Pfortmiller D
Fam Med; 2009 Feb; 41(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 19184682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of first-year veterinary students' communication skills using an objective structured clinical examination: the importance of context.
Hecker KG; Adams CL; Coe JB
J Vet Med Educ; 2012; 39(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 22951466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing the utility of communication OSCEs: omit station-specific checklists and provide students with narrative feedback.
Van Nuland M; Van den Noortgate W; van der Vleuten C; Jo G
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jul; 88(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 22322068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can student tutors act as examiners in an objective structured clinical examination?
Chenot JF; Simmenroth-Nayda A; Koch A; Fischer T; Scherer M; Emmert B; Stanske B; Kochen MM; Himmel W
Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 41(11):1032-8. PubMed ID: 17973763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An innovative method to assess negotiation skills necessary for quality improvement.
Varkey P; Gupta P; Bennet KE
Am J Med Qual; 2008; 23(5):350-5. PubMed ID: 18820139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does composition medium affect the psychometric properties of scores on an exercise designed to assess written medical communication skills?
Boulet JR; McKinley DW; Rebbecchi T; Whelan GP
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2007 May; 12(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 17041813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess multiple physician competencies in postgraduate training.
Jefferies A; Simmons B; Tabak D; McIlroy JH; Lee KS; Roukema H; Skidmore M
Med Teach; 2007 Mar; 29(2-3):183-91. PubMed ID: 17701631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The reliability of a modified Kalamazoo Consensus Statement Checklist for assessing the communication skills of multidisciplinary clinicians in the simulated environment.
Peterson EB; Calhoun AW; Rider EA
Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Sep; 96(3):411-8. PubMed ID: 25103180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using standardized video cases for assessment of medical communication skills: reliability of an objective structured video examination by computer.
Hulsman RL; Mollema ED; Oort FJ; Hoos AM; de Haes JC
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jan; 60(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 16332467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can students' reasons for choosing set answers to ethical vignettes be reliably rated? Development and testing of a method.
Goldie J; Schwartz L; McConnachie A; Jolly B; Morrison J
Med Teach; 2004 Dec; 26(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 15763875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing medical student competency in communication in the pre-clinical phase: objective structured video exam and SP exam.
Karabilgin OS; Vatansever K; Caliskan SA; Durak Hİ
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jun; 87(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 22169634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of the "FrOCK": Frankfurt observer communication checklist.
Sennekamp M; Gilbert K; Gerlach FM; Guethlin C
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(8):595-601. PubMed ID: 23084867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the 5-item doctor-patient communication competency instrument for medical students (DPCC-MS) using two years of assessment data.
Renaud JS; Côté L
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Oct; 17(1):189. PubMed ID: 29073899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First-year medical students' assessment of their own communication skills: a video-based, open-ended approach.
Zick A; Granieri M; Makoul G
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Oct; 68(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 17640843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
