These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15000103)

  • 21. Testimonial privilege and the problem of death: the Vincent Foster case and beyond.
    Behnke SH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(4):639-48. PubMed ID: 9894220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Another courtroom assault on the confidentiality of the psychotherapist-patient relationship.
    Leong GB; Silva JA; Weinstock R
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 Sep; 40(5):862-4. PubMed ID: 7595331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The psychotherapist-patient privilege: a therapeutic jurisprudence view.
    Winick BJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1996 Jan; 50(2):249-65. PubMed ID: 11660321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. It's been a privilege: advising patients of the Tarasoff duty and its legal consequences for the federal psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Klinka E
    Fordham Law Rev; 2009 Nov; 78(2):863-931. PubMed ID: 19938380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The psychotherapist-client testimonial privilege: defining the professional involved.
    Dubbelday CJ
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):777-826. PubMed ID: 11658791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Confidentiality of mental health records in federal courts: the path blazed by Sabree v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joinders of America, Local No. 33.
    Ruschioni SL
    New Engl Law Rev; 2004; 38(4):923-37. PubMed ID: 16482691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The psychotherapist-patient privilege in the federal court system.
    Harrison AS; Kaczynski CB
    J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Feb; 26(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 10136104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hippocrates to HIPAA: a foundation for a federal physician-patient privilege.
    Ruebner R; Reis LA
    Temple Law Rev; 2004; 77(3):505-75. PubMed ID: 17066561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychotherapist-patient privilege--patient's dangerous condition--confidentiality--legal duty to warn potential victim.
    Burns RE
    Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 11664482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New York's immediate need for a psychotherapist-patient privilege encompassing psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers.
    Auerbach RS
    Albany Law Rev; 2006; 69(3):889-912. PubMed ID: 17014064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Potential erosion of psychotherapist-patient privilege beyond California: dangers of "criminalizing" Tarasoff.
    Weinstock R; Leong GB; Silva JA
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 11443702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dangerous patients: an exception to the federal psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Combs H
    KY Law J; 2002; 91(2):457-76. PubMed ID: 15237517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Tarasoff dilemma in criminal court.
    Leong GB; Eth S; Silva JA
    J Forensic Sci; 1991 May; 36(3):728-35. PubMed ID: 1856640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Waiver of the psychotherapist-patient privilege: implications for child custody litigation.
    Boumil MM; Freitas DF; Freitas CF
    Health Matrix Clevel; 2012; 22(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 22616541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The psychotherapist-patient privilege in Washington: extending the privilege to community mental health clinics.
    Hague WW
    Wash Law Rev; 1983 Jul; 58(3):565-86. PubMed ID: 11658506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Constitutional privacy in psychotherapy.
    Smith SR
    George Washington Law Rev; 1980 Nov; 49(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 11658268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accessibility to a parent's psychotherapy records in custody disputes: how can the competing interests be balanced?
    Stansbury CD
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(4):522-41. PubMed ID: 20648534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Researching the effects of confidentiality law on patients' self-disclosures.
    Taube DO; Elwork A
    Prof Psychol Res Pr; 1990 Feb; 21(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 12186093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence law--the psychotherapist-patient privilege in federal courts.
    Cerveny K; Kent MJ
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1984; 59(3):791-816. PubMed ID: 11658789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.