These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15000195)

  • 21. The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder.
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 May; 19(5):377-91. PubMed ID: 19253811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment.
    Hawley ML; Litovsky RY; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3436-48. PubMed ID: 10380667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Binaural Glimpses at the Cocktail Party?
    Lingner A; Grothe B; Wiegrebe L; Ewert SD
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 17(5):461-73. PubMed ID: 27412529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model.
    Beutelmann R; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2479-97. PubMed ID: 20370031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An Evaluation of the World Health Organization and American Medical Association Ratings of Hearing Impairment and Simulated Single-Sided Deafness.
    Vermiglio AJ; Griffin S; Post C; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(7):634-647. PubMed ID: 29988011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.
    Brungart DS; Iyer N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2545-56. PubMed ID: 23039448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech intelligibility among modulated and spatially distributed noise sources.
    Culling JF; Mansell ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2254-61. PubMed ID: 23556593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial unmasking of nearby speech sources in a simulated anechoic environment.
    Shinn-Cunningham BG; Schickler J; Kopco N; Litovsky R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1118-29. PubMed ID: 11519579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Energetic and informational masking in a simulated restaurant environment.
    Culling JF
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():511-8. PubMed ID: 23716258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2181-92. PubMed ID: 15898659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Binaural pre-processing for contralateral sound field attenuation can improve speech-in-noise intelligibility for bilateral hearing-aid users.
    San-Victoriano FM; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2023 May; 432():108743. PubMed ID: 37003080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contribution of binaural masking release to improved speech intelligibility for different masker types.
    Sutojo S; van de Par S; Schoenmaker E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 29855098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.