128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15000370)
1. Finite-element analysis for lumbar interbody fusion under axial loading.
Lee KK; Teo EC; Fuss FK; Vanneuville V; Qiu TX; Ng HW; Yang K; Sabitzer RJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Mar; 51(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 15000370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of fusion-bone stiffness on the mechanical behavior of the lumbar spine after vertebral body replacement.
Rohlmann A; Zander T; Bergmann G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Mar; 21(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 16356613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spine with anterior interbody fusion on the different locations of the bone grafts.
Cheng CK; Chen CS; Liu CL
Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 12652031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro fixator rod loading after transforaminal compared to anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Kettler A; Niemeyer T; Issler L; Merk U; Mahalingam M; Werner K; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 16442678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element analysis of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cage and pedicle screw fixation.
Kim Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2558-68. PubMed ID: 17978654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design and finite-element evaluation of a versatile assembled lumbar interbody fusion cage.
Ding JY; Qian S; Wan L; Huang B; Wang LG; Zhou Y
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Apr; 130(4):565-71. PubMed ID: 20140621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Fantigrossi A; Galbusera F; Raimondi MT; Sassi M; Fornari M
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jan; 29(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 16563847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
Denozière G; Ku DN
J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Primary stability of 2 PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion) techniques--a biomechanical and finite element analysis].
Pitzen T; Matthis D; Müller-Storz H; Caspar W; Steudel WI; Harms J
Zentralbl Neurochir; 1999; 60(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 10726333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stress analysis of interbody fusion--finite element modelling of intervertebral implant and vertebral body.
Adam C; Pearcy M; McCombe P
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 May; 18(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 12689775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element analysis of anterior cervical spine interbody fusion.
Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
Biomed Mater Eng; 1997; 7(4):221-30. PubMed ID: 9408574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments.
Maiman DJ; Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
Biomed Mater Eng; 1999; 9(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 10436851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element application in implant research for treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease.
Zhang QH; Teo EC
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Dec; 30(10):1246-56. PubMed ID: 18804398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The biomechanics of lumbar graded facetectomy under anterior-shear load.
Teo EC; Lee KK; Qiu TX; Ng HW; Yang K
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Mar; 51(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 15000375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.
Wang M; Dalal S; Bagaria VB; McGrady LM; Rao RD
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation--a finite element study.
Tsuang YH; Chiang YF; Hung CY; Wei HW; Huang CH; Cheng CK
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jun; 31(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19117789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
