151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15000435)
1. Physicochemical and mechanical evaluation of a novel high density grade of silicified microcrystalline cellulose.
Steele DF; Tobyn M; Edge S; Chen A; Staniforth JN
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2004 Jan; 30(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 15000435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Weight and weight uniformity of hard gelatin capsules filled with microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose.
Felton LA; Garcia DI; Farmer R
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2002 Apr; 28(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 12056540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The mechanical properties of compacts of microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose.
Edge S; Steele DF; Chen A; Tobyn MJ; Staniforth JN
Int J Pharm; 2000 Apr; 200(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 10845687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Directional bonding in compacted microcrystalline cellulose.
Edge S; Steele DF; Tobyn MJ; Staniforth JN; Chen A
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2001 Aug; 27(7):613-21. PubMed ID: 11694008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Potential application of silicified microcrystalline cellulose in direct-fill formulations for automatic capsule-filling machines.
Guo M; Augsburger LL
Pharm Dev Technol; 2003; 8(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 12665197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Near IR spectroscopy to quantify the silica content and difference between silicified microcrystalline cellulose and physical mixtures of microcrystalline cellulose and silica.
Buckton G; Yonemochi E
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2000 Mar; 10(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 10699385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of non-crystalline cellulose as a novel excipient in solid dose products.
Pawar K; Render D; Rangari V; Lee Y; Babu RJ
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1512-1519. PubMed ID: 29734848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. True density of microcrystalline cellulose.
Sun CC
J Pharm Sci; 2005 Oct; 94(10):2132-4. PubMed ID: 16136576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Water sorption and near IR spectroscopy to study the differences between microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose before and after wet granulation.
Buckton G; Yonemochi E; Yoon WL; Moffat AC
Int J Pharm; 1999 Apr; 181(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 10370201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional performance of silicified microcrystalline cellulose versus microcrystalline cellulose: a case study.
Aljaberi A; Chatterji A; Shah NH; Sandhu HK
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19353418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of microcrystalline cellulose grade on shape and shape distributions of pellets produced by extrusion-spheronization.
Koo OM; Heng PW
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2001 Nov; 49(11):1383-7. PubMed ID: 11724226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is silicified wet-granulated microcrystalline cellulose better than original wet-granulated microcrystalline cellulose?
Habib YS; Abramowitz R; Jerzewski RL; Jain NB; Agharkar SN
Pharm Dev Technol; 1999 Aug; 4(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 10434289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Properties of microcrystalline cellulose and powder cellulose after extrusion/spheronization as studied by fourier transform Raman spectroscopy and environmental scanning electron microscopy.
Fechner PM; Wartewig S; Füting M; Heilmann A; Neubert RH; Kleinebudde P
AAPS PharmSci; 2003 Nov; 5(4):E31. PubMed ID: 15198519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of silicified microcrystalline cellulose II as a direct compression vehicle.
Rojas J; Kumar V
Int J Pharm; 2011 Sep; 416(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21708237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel multifunctional pharmaceutical excipients derived from microcrystalline cellulose-starch microparticulate composites prepared by compatibilized reactive polymer blending.
Builders PF; Bonaventure AM; Tiwalade A; Okpako LC; Attama AA
Int J Pharm; 2010 Mar; 388(1-2):159-67. PubMed ID: 20060448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a capillary rheometer to evaluate the rheological properties of microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose wet masses.
Luukkonen P; Newton JM; Podczeck F; Yliruusi J
Int J Pharm; 2001 Mar; 216(1-2):147-57. PubMed ID: 11274816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tensile strength and disintegration of tableted silicified microcrystalline cellulose: influences of interparticle bonding.
Kachrimanis K; Nikolakakis I; Malamataris S
J Pharm Sci; 2003 Jul; 92(7):1489-501. PubMed ID: 12820153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictions of tensile strength of binary tablets using linear and power law mixing rules.
Michrafy A; Michrafy M; Kadiri MS; Dodds JA
Int J Pharm; 2007 Mar; 333(1-2):118-26. PubMed ID: 17097245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fine grade engineered microcrystalline cellulose excipients for direct compaction: Assessing suitability of different dry coating processes.
Chen L; He Z; Kunnath K; Zheng K; Kim S; Davé RN
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2020 Aug; 151():105408. PubMed ID: 32502519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation into the impact of sub-populations of agglomerates on the particle size distribution and flow properties of conventional microcrystalline cellulose grades.
Gamble JF; Chiu WS; Tobyn M
Pharm Dev Technol; 2011 Oct; 16(5):542-8. PubMed ID: 20565228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
