294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15000617)
1. Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcification clusters.
Kallergi M
Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):314-26. PubMed ID: 15000617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A ranklet-based image representation for mass classification in digital mammograms.
Masotti M
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3951-61. PubMed ID: 17089857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset.
Li H; Giger ML; Yuan Y; Chen W; Horsch K; Lan L; Jamieson AR; Sennett CA; Jansen SA
Acad Radiol; 2008 Nov; 15(11):1437-45. PubMed ID: 18995194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.
Gupta S; Markey MK
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1598-606. PubMed ID: 16013719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1455-65. PubMed ID: 11488579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microcalcification detection based on wavelet domain hidden markov tree model: study for inclusion to computer aided diagnostic prompting system.
Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2206-19. PubMed ID: 17654922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for the segmentation of microcalcification clusters in mammograms.
Gavrielides MA; Lo JY; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 11998828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of difference of Gaussian filters in the detection of mammographic regions.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4104-14. PubMed ID: 17153390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
