These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15000621)

  • 1. Figures of merit for detectors in digital radiography. I. Flat background and deterministic blurring.
    Pineda AR; Barrett HH
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):348-58. PubMed ID: 15000621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit.
    Gagne RM; Boswell JS; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2180-93. PubMed ID: 12945984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Figures of merit for detectors in digital radiography. II. Finite number of secondaries and structured backgrounds.
    Pineda AR; Barrett HH
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 15000622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid Monte Carlo simulation of detector DQE(f).
    Star-Lack J; Sun M; Meyer A; Morf D; Constantin D; Fahrig R; Abel E
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031916. PubMed ID: 24593734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative analysis of OTF, NPS, and DQE in energy integrating and photon counting digital x-ray detectors.
    Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6480-95. PubMed ID: 21302803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors.
    Richard S; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1397-413. PubMed ID: 15984691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of clinical full field digital mammography with the task specific system-model-based Fourier Hotelling observer (SMFHO) SNR.
    Liu H; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Benevides L; Gu S; Kyprianou IS
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051907. PubMed ID: 24784386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. X-ray imaging using avalanche multiplication in amorphous selenium: investigation of depth dependent avalanche noise.
    Hunt DC; Tanioka K; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):976-86. PubMed ID: 17441244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical Note: modification of the standard gain correction algorithm to compensate for the number of used reference flat frames in detector performance studies.
    Konstantinidis AC; Olivo A; Speller RD
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6683-7. PubMed ID: 22149850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
    Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Ferrari P; Tassoni D
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
    Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linear response theory for detectors consisting of discrete arrays.
    Albert M; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2000 Oct; 27(10):2417-34. PubMed ID: 11099212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amorphous selenium flat panel detectors for digital mammography: validation of a NPWE model observer with CDMAM observer performance experiments.
    Segui JA; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3711-22. PubMed ID: 17089837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital x-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: reduction of aliasing.
    Ji WG; Zhao W; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1998 Nov; 25(11):2148-62. PubMed ID: 9829239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.