These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15000622)

  • 1. Figures of merit for detectors in digital radiography. II. Finite number of secondaries and structured backgrounds.
    Pineda AR; Barrett HH
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 15000622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Figures of merit for detectors in digital radiography. I. Flat background and deterministic blurring.
    Pineda AR; Barrett HH
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):348-58. PubMed ID: 15000621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit.
    Gagne RM; Boswell JS; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2180-93. PubMed ID: 12945984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of clinical full field digital mammography with the task specific system-model-based Fourier Hotelling observer (SMFHO) SNR.
    Liu H; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Benevides L; Gu S; Kyprianou IS
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051907. PubMed ID: 24784386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance.
    Barrett HH; Denny JL; Wagner RF; Myers KJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1995 May; 12(5):834-52. PubMed ID: 7730951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient detrending of uniform images for accurate determination of the noise power spectrum at low frequencies.
    González-López A; Campos-Morcillo PA
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105001. PubMed ID: 30995618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Presampling, algorithm factors, and noise: considerations for CT in particular and for medical imaging in general.
    Kachelriess M; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1321-34. PubMed ID: 15984684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extension of x-ray imaging linear systems analysis to detectors with energy discrimination capability.
    Marchal JP
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2717-28. PubMed ID: 16193803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comment on "Figures of merit for detectors in digital radiography".
    Maidment A; Albert M
    Med Phys; 2004 Aug; 31(8):2364-5; author reply 2366-7. PubMed ID: 15377104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical reconstruction for x-ray computed tomography using energy-integrating detectors.
    Lasio GM; Whiting BR; Williamson JF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2247-66. PubMed ID: 17404467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors.
    Richard S; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1397-413. PubMed ID: 15984691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance image enhancement using stochastic resonance in Fourier domain.
    Rallabandi VP; Roy PK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Nov; 28(9):1361-73. PubMed ID: 20797832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Techniques to improve the accuracy of noise power spectrum measurements in digital x-ray imaging based on background trends removal.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1600-10. PubMed ID: 21520872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stochastic resonance-based tomographic transform for computed tomographic image enhancement of brain lesions.
    Rallabandi VP; Roy PK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(6):966-74. PubMed ID: 19204462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of resolution and noise characteristics of digital radiographic detectors on the detectability of lung nodules.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Hoeschen C
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1603-13. PubMed ID: 15259665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance evaluation of a modular gamma camera using a detectability index.
    Sain JD; Barrett HH
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Jan; 44(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 12515877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic digital image enhancement. Part II: transform domain techniques.
    Analoui M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):65-77. PubMed ID: 11313724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.