298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15001275)
1. The robustness of dose distributions to displacement and migration of 125I permanent seed implants over a wide range of seed number, activity, and designs.
Beaulieu L; Archambault L; Aubin S; Oral E; Taschereau R; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1298-308. PubMed ID: 15001275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.
Mangili P; Stea L; Cattani F; Lappi S; Giglioli F; Calamia E; Ziglio F; Martinelli R; Longobardi B
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr; 71(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15066291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of random seed placement error in permanent transperineal prostate seed implant.
Bues M; Holupka EJ; Meskell P; Kaplan ID
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Apr; 79(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16515813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of the radial function on I-125 seeds used for permanent prostate implantation.
Pickett B; Pouliot J
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 15324917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetry accuracy as a function of seed localization uncertainty in permanent prostate brachytherapy: increased seed number correlates with less variability in prostate dosimetry.
Su Y; Davis BJ; Furutani KM; Herman MG; Robb RA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3105-19. PubMed ID: 17505092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Ali I; Algan O; Thompson S; Sindhwani P; Herman T; Cheng CY; Ahmad S
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5595-611. PubMed ID: 19717887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?
Potters L; Calugaru E; Jassal A; Presser J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(4):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16682144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can the cost of permanent prostate implants be reduced? An argument for peripheral loading with higher strength seeds.
Maguire PD; Waterman FM; Dicker AP
Tech Urol; 2000 Jun; 6(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 10798805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate brachytherapy post-implant dosimetry: a comparison between higher and lower source density.
Thomas CW; Kruk A; McGahan CE; Spadinger I; Morris WJ
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Apr; 83(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17368844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a dynamic real-time intraoperative permanent prostate brachytherapy methodology.
Potters L; Calguaru E; Thornton KB; Jackson T; Huang D
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 15062140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric and volumetric criteria for selecting a source activity and a source type ((125)I or (103)Pd) in the presence of irregular seed placement in permanent prostate implants.
Wuu CS; Ennis RD; Schiff PB; Lee EK; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jun; 47(3):815-20. PubMed ID: 10837969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and physical determinants for toxicity of 125-I seed prostate brachytherapy.
Wust P; von Borczyskowski DW; Henkel T; Rosner C; Graf R; Tilly W; Budach V; Felix R; Kahmann F
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Oct; 73(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15465144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AnchorSeed for the reduction of source movement in prostate brachytherapy with the Mick applicator implant technique.
Badwan HO; Shanahan AE; Adams MA; Shanahan TG; Mueller PW; Markwell SJ; Tarter TH
Brachytherapy; 2010; 9(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 19762286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose-volume conundrum for response of prostate cancer to brachytherapy: summary dosimetric measures and their relationship to tumor control probability.
D'Souza WD; Thames HD; Kuban DA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 15050335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo investigation of I-125 interseed attenuation for standard and thinner seeds in prostate brachytherapy with phantom validation using a MOSFET.
Mason J; Al-Qaisieh B; Bownes P; Henry A; Thwaites D
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031717. PubMed ID: 23464312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose homogeneity as a function of source activity in optimized I-125 prostate implant treatment plans.
D'Souza WD; Meyer RR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(4):1120-30. PubMed ID: 11704337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability of prostate brachytherapy pre-implant dosimetry: a multi-institutional analysis.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Wallner KE; Blasko JC; Michalski J; Aronowitz J; Grimm P; Moran BJ; McLaughlin PW; Usher J; Lief JH; Allen ZA
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16344253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is a loose-seed nomogram still valid for prostate brachytherapy in a stranded-seed era?
Kudchadker RJ; Swanson DA; Kuban DA; Lee AK; Bruno TL; Frank SJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Oct; 72(2):623-7. PubMed ID: 18410998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Idealized line source configuration for permanent 125I prostate implants.
Leclerc G; Lavallée MC; Tubic D; Métivier J; Vigneault E; Beaulieu L
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Aug; 72(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 15297139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
