These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15001867)
1. [Fundamental study of the relation between flow velocity and signal intensity in the TrueFISP sequence]. Uchikoshi M; Ueda T; Nishiki S; Satou K; Wada A; Imaoka I; Matsuo M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Dec; 59(12):1529-34. PubMed ID: 15001867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of imaging parameters, flow velocity, and pulsatile flow on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography: experimental studies. Kodama T; Watanabe K Eur J Radiol; 1997 Dec; 26(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 9481591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Report on the ECR2003 (European Congress of Radiology): non-contrast intracranial MR venography with 3D-phase contrast imaging: optimization of presaturation pulse and velocity encoding]. Mimura S; Iwata N; Yamane T; Hirata Y; Tanino F; Sugihara S; Kinoshita T; Ogawa T Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jul; 59(7):823-4. PubMed ID: 12937401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study. Fürst G; Hofer M; Sitzer M; Kahn T; Müller E; Mödder U J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 7560312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can FLAIR hyperintense vessel (FHV) signs be influenced by varying MR parameters and flow velocities? A flow phantom analysis. Ahn SJ; Lee KY; Ahn SS; Suh H; Kim BS; Lee SK Acta Radiol; 2016 May; 57(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 26124459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blood velocity assessment using 3D bright-blood time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography. Miraux S; Franconi JM; Thiaudière E Magn Reson Med; 2006 Sep; 56(3):469-73. PubMed ID: 16902973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinguishing high-flow from low-flow vascular malformations using maximum intensity projection images in dynamic magnetic resonance angiography - comparison to other MR-based techniques. Kociemba A; Karmelita-Katulska K; Stajgis M; Oszkinis G; Pyda M Acta Radiol; 2016 May; 57(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 26560553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Delineation of simulated vascular stenosis with Gd-DTPA-enhanced 3D gradient echo MR angiography: an experimental study. Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Onomichi M; Tsuchigame T; Takahashi M J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 10667664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of blood inflow and B(1)-field inhomogeneity on measurement of the arterial input function in axial 3D spoiled gradient echo dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Roberts C; Little R; Watson Y; Zhao S; Buckley DL; Parker GJ Magn Reson Med; 2011 Jan; 65(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20928889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [MR-Imaging of lower leg muscle perfusion]. Leppek R; Hoos O; Sattler A; Kohle S; Azzam S; Al Haffar I; Keil B; Ricken P; Klose KJ; Alfke H Herz; 2004 Feb; 29(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 14968340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging parameter effects in apparent diffusion coefficient determination of magnetic resonance imaging. Ogura A; Hayakawa K; Miyati T; Maeda F Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jan; 77(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 19646836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding. Schubert T; Bieri O; Pansini M; Stippich C; Santini F Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 24300842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Flow quantification with magnetic resonance: preliminary results with phase contrast technique]. Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Paneblanco V; Scipioni A; Di Girolamo M; Kayal R; Passariello R Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):218-22. PubMed ID: 8975305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]