These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15002440)

  • 1. Mad as a respiratory physiologist.
    Goodman N
    Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Jan; 54(498):77. PubMed ID: 15002440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Goodbye mercury? Blood pressure measurement and its future.
    Varughese GI; Lip GY
    J R Soc Med; 2005 Mar; 98(3):89-90. PubMed ID: 15738548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Will the millimetre of mercury be replaced by the kilopascal?
    Colquitt PJ
    J Hypertens; 1999 Feb; 17(2):305-6. PubMed ID: 10067802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In praise of mercury sphygmomanometers. Electronic readings of blood pressure seem to be higher than readings obtained with mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Ireland J
    BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7296):1249. PubMed ID: 11388188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [European regulations and the future of mercury sphygmomanometers in the clinical setting].
    Vinyoles E; Armengol F; Bayó J; Mengual L; Salvadó A; Pepió JM;
    Med Clin (Barc); 2003 Apr; 120(12):460-3. PubMed ID: 12689554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Goodbye mercury.
    Sowby D
    J R Soc Med; 2005 Jun; 98(6):294-5. PubMed ID: 15928392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated sphygmomanometers should not replace manual ones, based on current evidence.
    Turner MJ; van Schalkwyk JM
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Aug; 21(8):845; author reply 846. PubMed ID: 18648356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic versus mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Sharvill J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Feb; 54(499):137-8. PubMed ID: 15046060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic versus mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Morrison CL
    Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Feb; 54(499):136-7. PubMed ID: 15046059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic versus mercury sphygmomanometers.
    McAll G
    Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Feb; 54(499):136. PubMed ID: 15046058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The latest developments of the mercurial sphygmomanometers' substitute products].
    Zhou HW; Shang CH
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2009 Sep; 33(5):386-7. PubMed ID: 20073253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of sphygmomanometers at pharmacies.
    Erdem DG; Erdem E; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Selim N; Demiray F; Sari A; Akpolat T
    Kidney Blood Press Res; 2009; 32(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 19622898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Issues surrounding blood pressure measurements.
    Health Devices; 2002 Aug; 31(8):305, 307. PubMed ID: 12216341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In praise of mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Lawes EG
    BMJ; 2000 Dec; 321(7275):1534. PubMed ID: 11189699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do mercury and aneroid sphygmomanometers give identical readings at high altitude?
    Dasgupta DJ; Dhawan AK; Sharma AK; Kaushal SK; Chaudhary SK
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1989 Jan; 87(1):20. PubMed ID: 2754271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electronic sphygmomanometers: are they a source of mercury in hospitals?
    Colquitt PJ
    Hypertension; 2002 Mar; 39(3):e21. PubMed ID: 11897776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of two electronic sphygmomanometers with the traditional mercury type: a cost-effective study.
    Tam G
    Nurs Times; 1979 May; 75(21):880-5. PubMed ID: 109814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blood pressure measurement in patients with rate controlled atrial fibrillation using mercury sphygmomanometer and Omron HEM-750CP deice in the clinic setting.
    Jani B; Bulpitt CJ; Rajkumar C
    J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):543-5. PubMed ID: 16598291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response to the Advisory Statement from the Council for high blood pressure research of the American Heart Association advocating retention of mercury sphygmomanometers.
    O'Brien E
    Hypertension; 2001 Oct; 38(4):E19-20. PubMed ID: 11641320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.