252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15003772)
1. The dipole location shift within the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components N100m and mismatch negativity (MMNm).
Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):906-13. PubMed ID: 15003772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Memory-based mismatch response to changes in duration of auditory stimuli: an MEG study.
Hsu WY; Cheng CH; Lin HC; Liao KK; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 121(10):1744-50. PubMed ID: 20471314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
Rosburg T
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Left hemispheric dipole locations of the neuromagnetic mismatch negativity to frequency, intensity and duration deviants.
Rosburg T
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 16(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 12589892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m.
Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
Brain Topogr; 2002; 15(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12371675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory evoked fields differentially encode speech features: an MEG investigation of the P50m and N100m time courses during syllable processing.
Tavabi K; Obleser J; Dobel C; Pantev C
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 May; 25(10):3155-62. PubMed ID: 17561829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Test-retest stability of the magnetic mismatch response (MMNm).
Tervaniemi M; Sinkkonen J; Virtanen J; Kallio J; Ilmoniemi RJ; Salonen O; Näätänen R
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 116(8):1897-905. PubMed ID: 15990358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of lorazepam on the neuromagnetic mismatch negativity (MMNm) and auditory evoked field component N100m.
Rosburg T; Marinou V; Haueisen J; Smesny S; Sauer H
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2004 Sep; 29(9):1723-33. PubMed ID: 15127083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential cerebral reactivity to shortest and longer tones: neuromagnetic and behavioral evidence.
Cheng CH; Hsu WY; Shih YH; Lin HC; Liao KK; Wu ZA; Lin YY
Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):260-70. PubMed ID: 20600746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of gender and personality traits on individual difference in auditory mismatch: a magnetoencephalographic (MMNm) study.
Matsubayashi J; Kawakubo Y; Suga M; Takei Y; Kumano S; Fukuda M; Itoh K; Yumoto M; Kasai K
Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():159-65. PubMed ID: 18725215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of NMDA receptor antagonist memantine on mismatch negativity.
Korostenskaja M; Nikulin VV; Kicić D; Nikulina AV; Kähkönen S
Brain Res Bull; 2007 May; 72(4-6):275-83. PubMed ID: 17452287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delayed N100m latency in focal epilepsy associated with spike dipoles at the primary auditory cortex.
Kubota Y; Otsuki T; Kaneko Y; Niimura K; Nakama H; Okazaki M
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 24(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 17545830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The development of the length of the temporal window of integration for rapidly presented auditory information as indexed by MMN.
Wang W; Datta H; Sussman E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1695-706. PubMed ID: 15905124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetoencephalographic recording of auditory mismatch negativity in response to duration and frequency deviants in a single session in patients with schizophrenia.
Suga M; Nishimura Y; Kawakubo Y; Yumoto M; Kasai K
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 70(7):295-302. PubMed ID: 27162140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory evoked field at threshold.
Lütkenhöner B; Klein JS
Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):188-200. PubMed ID: 17434696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Theta oscillation during auditory change detection: An MEG study.
Hsiao FJ; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
Biol Psychol; 2009 Apr; 81(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 19428969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre-attentive auditory processing in ultra-high-risk for schizophrenia with magnetoencephalography.
Shin KS; Kim JS; Kang DH; Koh Y; Choi JS; O'Donnell BF; Chung CK; Kwon JS
Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Jun; 65(12):1071-8. PubMed ID: 19200950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of continuous masking noise on tone-evoked magnetic fields in humans.
Morita T; Fujiki N; Nagamine T; Hiraumi H; Naito Y; Shibasaki H; Ito J
Brain Res; 2006 May; 1087(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 16626668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of the task of categorizing FM direction on auditory evoked magnetic fields in the human auditory cortex.
König R; Sieluzycki C; Simserides C; Heil P; Scheich H
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():102-17. PubMed ID: 18420183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
