705 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15004663)
1. The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field.
Milecki P; Piotrowski T; Dymnicka M
Neoplasma; 2004; 51(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15004663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A phase II trial for the optimisation of treatment position in the radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
O'Neill L; Armstrong J; Buckney S; Assiri M; Cannon M; Holmberg O
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18453021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative treatment planning on localized prostate carcinoma conformal photon- versus proton-based radiotherapy.
Mock U; Bogner J; Georg D; Auberger T; Pötter R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Jul; 181(7):448-55. PubMed ID: 15995838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose distribution in 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: comparison of two treatment techniques (six coplanar fields and two dynamic arcs).
Jereczek-Fossa BA; Cattani F; D'Onofrio A; Cambria R; Kowalczyk A; Corallo A; Vavassori A; Zerini D; Ivaldi GB; DeCobelli O; Orecchia R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Dec; 81(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 17113670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Persistently better treatment planning results of intensity-modulated (IMRT) over conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients with significant variation of clinical target volume and/or organs-at-risk.
Fenoglietto P; Laliberte B; Allaw A; Ailleres N; Idri K; Hay MH; Moscardo CL; Gourgou S; Dubois JB; Azria D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 18215434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of non-exclusion of the rectum from the boost PTV in IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients.
Kassim I; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19278745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A dose-escalation trial with the adaptive radiotherapy process as a delivery system in localized prostate cancer: analysis of chronic toxicity.
Brabbins D; Martinez A; Yan D; Lockman D; Wallace M; Gustafson G; Chen P; Vicini F; Wong J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Feb; 61(2):400-8. PubMed ID: 15667959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the optimal co-planar field arrangement for use in the boost phase of dose escalated conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.
Khoo VS; Bedford JL; Webb S; Dearnaley DP
Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):177-82. PubMed ID: 11718391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with multileaf collimators (MLCs) optimization of the undulating dose distribution at the MLC edge.
Koelbl O; Schwab F; Bratengeier K; Vordermark D; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Feb; 181(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 15702299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized trial of supine vs. prone positioning in patients undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Bayley AJ; Catton CN; Haycocks T; Kelly V; Alasti H; Bristow R; Catton P; Crook J; Gospodarowicz MK; McLean M; Milosevic M; Warde P
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Jan; 70(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 15036850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simplified intensity-modulated arc therapy for dose escalated prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Bauman G; Gete E; Chen JZ; Wong E
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 15023389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric impact and theoretical clinical benefits of fiducial markers for dose escalated prostate cancer radiation treatment.
Gauthier I; Carrier JF; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Fortin B; Taussky D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jul; 74(4):1128-33. PubMed ID: 19147306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative radiation treatment for rectal cancer: comparison of target coverage and small bowel NTCP in conventional vs. 3D-conformal planning.
Cella L; Ciscognetti N; Martin G; Liuzzi R; Punzo G; Solla R; Farella A; Salvatore M; Pacelli R
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 19181259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phase II dose escalation study of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: use of dose-volume constraints to achieve rectal isotoxicity.
Vargas C; Yan D; Kestin LL; Krauss D; Lockman DM; Brabbins DS; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Sep; 63(1):141-9. PubMed ID: 16111582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the conventional 'box technique' with two different 'conformal' beam arrangements for prostate cancer treatment.
Magrini SM; Cellai E; Rossi F; Pertici M; Compagnucci A; Biti GP
Cancer Radiother; 1999; 3(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 10394339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiobiological impact of reduced margins and treatment technique for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
Jensen I; Carl J; Lund B; Larsen EH; Nielsen J
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 20488692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Dosimetric analysis of radiotherapy with middle shielding blocks of different widths at the lower cervical supraclavicular field for stage N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Li FM; Luo W; He ZC; Zhang L; Sun Y; Qin WJ; Lu LX; Han F; Liu XQ; Liu MZ
Ai Zheng; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1127-32. PubMed ID: 17927886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
