These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1500479)

  • 1. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion used in a donor insemination programme.
    Kahn JA; von Düring V; Sunde A; Molne K
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Jul; 7(6):806-12. PubMed ID: 1500479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) versus intra-uterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study.
    Kahn JA; Sunde A; Koskemies A; von Düring V; Sørdal T; Christensen F; Molne K
    Hum Reprod; 1993 Jun; 8(6):890-4. PubMed ID: 8345080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high as standard intrauterine insemination.
    Fanchin R; Olivennes F; Righini C; Hazout A; Schwab B; Frydman R
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Sep; 64(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 7641902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of unexplained infertility. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP).
    Kahn JA; Sunde A; von Düring V; Sørdal T; Molne K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1993 Apr; 72(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 8385855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non tubal infertility.
    Cantineau AE; Cohlen BJ; Al-Inany H; Heineman MJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001502. PubMed ID: 15266448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized controlled trial of fallopian tube sperm perfusion compared with standard intrauterine insemination for women with non-tubal infertility.
    Farquhar CM; Brown J; Arroll N; Gupta D; Boothroyd CV; Al Bassam M; Moir J; Johnson NP
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2134-9. PubMed ID: 23578949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion using a blocking device in the treatment of unexplained infertility.
    Ricci G; Nucera G; Pozzobon C; Boscolo R; Giolo E; Guaschino S
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Dec; 76(6):1242-8. PubMed ID: 11730758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial.
    Peeraer K; Debrock S; De Loecker P; Tomassetti C; Laenen A; Welkenhuysen M; Meeuwis L; Pelckmans S; Mol BW; Spiessens C; De Neubourg D; D'Hooghe TM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1079-88. PubMed ID: 25788569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion has no advantage over intra-uterine insemination when used in combination with ovarian stimulation for the treatment of unexplained infertility.
    Gregoriou O; Pyrgiotis E; Konidaris S; Papadias C; Zourlas PA
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1995; 39(4):226-8. PubMed ID: 7635364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Efficacy of a program of insemination with cryopreserved semen as treatment of the male factor].
    Aranda Gallegos JE; Alvarez Robles L; Barrón Vallejo J; Kably Ambe A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1997 Dec; 65():520-2. PubMed ID: 9477647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors responsible for multiple pregnancies after ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination with gonadotropins.
    Valbuena D; Simón C; Romero JL; Remohí J; Pellicer A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1996 Sep; 13(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 8897127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal infertility.
    Shekhawat GS
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2012 Jul; 68(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 24532873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Questioning the efficacy of Fallopian tube sperm perfusion.
    El Sadek MM; Amer MK; Abdel-Malak G
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Nov; 13(11):3053-6. PubMed ID: 9853855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion: first clinical experience.
    Kahn JA; von Düring V; Sunde A; Sørdal T; Molne K
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Jun; 7 Suppl 1():19-24. PubMed ID: 1447366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
    Besselink DE; Farquhar C; Kremer JA; Marjoribanks J; O'Brien P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Apr; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 18425862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrauterine insemination with donor semen. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 1131 cycles.
    Khalil MR; Rasmussen PE; Erb K; Laursen SB; Rex S; Westergaard LG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Apr; 80(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 11264610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of sperm morphology and number on success of intrauterine insemination.
    Badawy A; Elnashar A; Eltotongy M
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 18304534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting the success of artificial insemination by frozen donor semen.
    Wong AW; Ho PC; Kwan M; Ma HK
    Int J Fertil; 1989; 34(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 2565300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of semen characteristics on IUI combined with mild ovarian stimulation.
    Yalti S; Gürbüz B; Sezer H; Celik S
    Arch Androl; 2004; 50(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 15277001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Retrospective evaluation of an intra-uterine insemination program with donor].
    Wainer R; Merlet F; Bailly M; Aegerter P; Tribalat S; Roussel C; Bisson JP
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1993 Nov; 21(11):839-43. PubMed ID: 8281236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.