BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15004864)

  • 1. An evaluation of patient satisfaction in Turkey with the EUROPEP instrument.
    Dağdeviren N; Akturk Z
    Yonsei Med J; 2004 Feb; 45(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15004864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [How do patients evaluate general practice? German results from the European Project on Patient Evaluation of General Practice Care (EUROPEP)].
    Klingenberg A; Bahrs O; Szecsenyi J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1999 Aug; 93(6):437-45. PubMed ID: 10519193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient satisfaction with family practice in Turkey: Three-year trend from 2010 to 2012.
    Aktürk Z; Ateşoğlu D; Çiftçi E
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2015; 21(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 26205156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients' evaluations of family practice care and attributes of a good family physician.
    Ali NS; Khuwaja AK; Kausar S; Nanji K
    Qual Prim Care; 2012; 20(5):375-83. PubMed ID: 23114005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [How do patients evaluate their general practitioners? Danish results from a European study].
    Mainz J; Vedsted P; Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Jan; 162(5):654-8. PubMed ID: 10707598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the Italian version of the EUROPEP instrument for patient evaluation of general practice care.
    Milano M; Mola E; Collecchia G; Del Carlo A; Giancane R; Visentin G; Nicolucci A
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2007; 13(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 17534746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.
    Grol R; Wensing M; Mainz J; Jung HP; Ferreira P; Hearnshaw H; Hjortdahl P; Olesen F; Reis S; Ribacke M; Szecsenyi J;
    Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Nov; 50(460):882-7. PubMed ID: 11141874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient satisfaction with availability of general practice: an international comparison.
    Wensing M; Vedsted P; Kersnik J; Peersman W; Klingenberg A; Hearnshaw H; Hjortdahl P; Paulus D; Künzi B; Mendive J; Grol R
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Apr; 14(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 11954680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient's evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience.
    Dimova R; Stoyanova R; Keskinova D
    Croat Med J; 2017 Feb; 58(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 28252877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patients' evaluations of European general practice--revisited after 11 years.
    Petek D; Künzi B; Kersnik J; Szecsenyi J; Wensing M
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2011 Dec; 23(6):621-8. PubMed ID: 21831966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of patient satisfaction with family practice care in Slovenia.
    Kersnik J
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2000 Apr; 12(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10830671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP).
    Grol R; Wensing M; Mainz J; Ferreira P; Hearnshaw H; Hjortdahl P; Olesen F; Ribacke M; Spenser T; Szécsényi J
    Fam Pract; 1999 Feb; 16(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 10321388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doctor and practice characteristics associated with differences in patient evaluations of general practice.
    Heje HN; Vedsted P; Sokolowski I; Olesen F
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Apr; 7():46. PubMed ID: 17407605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between family doctors' practices characteristics and patient evaluation of care.
    Klemenc-Ketis Z; Petek D; Kersnik J
    Health Policy; 2012 Aug; 106(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 22583579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of national health care systems on patient evaluations of general practice in Europe.
    Wensing M; Baker R; Szecsenyi J; Grol R;
    Health Policy; 2004 Jun; 68(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 15113646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Norwegian EUROPEP questionnaire for patient evaluation of general practice: data quality, reliability and construct validity.
    Bjertnaes OA; Lyngstad I; Malterud K; Garratt A
    Fam Pract; 2011 Jun; 28(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 21078822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient satisfaction with primary care: are there differences between the approaches in family and general medicine?
    Gavran L; Jašarević E; Hasanica N
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2013 Aug; 10(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 23892862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of patients' opinions of primary care physicians: the use of EUROPEP in Gaza Strip-Palestine.
    Abu Mourad T; Shashaa S; Markaki A; Alegakis A; Lionis C; Philalithis A
    J Med Syst; 2007 Dec; 31(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 18041283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of primary care from the perspective of users: adaptation of the EUROPEP instrument for major Brazilian urban centers].
    Brandão AL; Giovanella L; Campos CE
    Cien Saude Colet; 2013 Jan; 18(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 23338501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The good general practice--Norwegian patients' evaluation and priorities].
    Kvamme OJ; Hjortdahl P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2607-9. PubMed ID: 9324813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.