278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15004877)
1. Use of the rectal retractor to reduce the rectal dose in high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for a carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Lee KC; Kim TH; Choi JH; Choi MS; Kim CY; Kim JY
Yonsei Med J; 2004 Feb; 45(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 15004877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT based 3-dimensional treatment planning of intracavitary brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix: comparison between dose-volume histograms and ICRU point doses to the rectum and bladder.
Hashim N; Jamalludin Z; Ung NM; Ho GF; Malik RA; Phua VC
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5259-64. PubMed ID: 25040985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric parameters that predict late rectal complications after curative radiotherapy in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma.
Hyun Kim T; Choi J; Park SY; Lee SH; Lee KC; Yang DS; Shin KH; Cho KH; Lim HS; Kim JY
Cancer; 2005 Sep; 104(6):1304-11. PubMed ID: 16078262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patterns of brachytherapy practice for patients with carcinoma of the cervix (1996-1999): a patterns of care study.
Erickson B; Eifel P; Moughan J; Rownd J; Iarocci T; Owen J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):1083-92. PubMed ID: 16099599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Point vs. volumetric bladder and rectal doses in combined intracavitary-interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy: correlation and comparison with published Vienna applicator data.
Yaparpalvi R; Mutyala S; Gorla GR; Butler J; Mah D; Garg MK; Kalnicki S
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 18782683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ring Versus Ovoids and Intracavitary Versus Intracavitary-Interstitial Applicators in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy: Results From the EMBRACE I Study.
Serban M; Kirisits C; de Leeuw A; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Nesvacil N; Swamidas J; Hudej R; Lowe G; Hellebust TP; Menon G; Oinam A; Bownes P; Oosterveld B; De Brabandere M; Koedooder K; Langeland Marthinsen AB; Whitney D; Lindegaard J; Tanderup K;
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Apr; 106(5):1052-1062. PubMed ID: 32007365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unique role of proximal rectal dose in late rectal complications for patients with cervical cancer undergoing high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy.
Cheng JC; Peng LC; Chen YH; Huang DY; Wu JK; Jian JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Nov; 57(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 14575832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between tandem and ovoids and interstitial gynecologic template brachytherapy dosimetry using a hypothetical computer model.
Hsu IC; Speight J; Hai J; Vigneault E; Phillips T; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Feb; 52(2):538-43. PubMed ID: 11872302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of intracavitary brachytherapy parameters and correlation with outcome in patients with carcinoma of the cervix.
Katz A; Eifel PJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1417-25. PubMed ID: 11121642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of "optimized" treatment planning for tandem and ring, and tandem and ovoids, using high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Noyes WR; Peters NE; Thomadsen BR; Fowler JF; Buchler DA; Stitt JA; Kinsella TJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jan; 31(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 7995771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of correlation between rectal complications and rectal dose following high dose rate intracavitary radiotherapy in patients with uterine cervix cancer: in vivo dosimetric analysis.
Shin KH; Huh SJ; Chie EK; Choi DR; Lim DH; Kim MK; Lee KC; Kim DY; Ahn YC
Radiat Med; 1999; 17(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 10510902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of ICRU point doses and volumetric doses of organs at risk (OARs) in brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Vinod SK; Caldwell K; Lau A; Fowler AR
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Jun; 55(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21696566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between in vivo dosimetry and barium contrast technique for prediction of rectal complications in high-dose-rate intracavitary radiotherapy in cervix cancer patients.
Huh SJ; Lim DH; Ahn YC; Lee JE; Kang MK; Shin SS; Shin KH; Kim B; Park W; Han Y
Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 Mar; 179(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 12627263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bladder-Rectum Spacer Balloon versus Vaginal Gauze Packing in High Dose Rate Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Randomised Study. Part II.
Rai B; Patel FD; Chakraborty S; Kapoor R; Sharma SC; Kumaravelu S; Raghukumar P; Aprem AS
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2015 Dec; 27(12):713-9. PubMed ID: 26144319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Additional rectal and sigmoid mucosal points and doses in high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix: a dosimetric study.
Mahantshetty U; Tiwana MS; Jamema S; Mishra S; Engineer R; Deshpande D; Shrivastava S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2011; 7(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 22044811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rectal and bladder dose reduction with the addition of intravaginal balloons to vaginal packing in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Eng TY; Patel AJ; Ha CS
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(3):312-318. PubMed ID: 27032995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bladder-rectum spacer balloon in high-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervix carcinoma.
Rai B; Patel FD; Chakraborty S; Sharma SC; Kapoor R; Aprem AS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Apr; 85(5):e217-22. PubMed ID: 23517809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D CT-based volumetric dose assessment of 2D plans using GEC-ESTRO guidelines for cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Gao M; Albuquerque K; Chi A; Rusu I
Brachytherapy; 2010; 9(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19853536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective comparison of rectal dose reduction during intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer using three rectal retraction techniques.
Kong I; Vorunganti S; Patel M; Farrell T; Timotin E; Quinlan-Davidson S; Pond G; Sur R; Hunter R
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(4):450-455. PubMed ID: 27090224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. De-escalation of the cumulative central radiation dose according to the tumor response can reduce rectal toxicity without compromising the treatment outcome in patients with uterine cervical cancer.
Kim KH; Kim S; Kim GE; Koom WS; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Suh CO; Kim YB
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Dec; 139(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 26456139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
