These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15004991)

  • 1. [Mandibular distraction during orthodontic treatment].
    Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2003 Jan; 110(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15004991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Duration of orthodontic treatment and mandibular lengthening by means of distraction or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with Angle Class II malocclusions.
    Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 15643411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcome of treatment of Class II malocclusion by intraoral mandibular distraction.
    Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 42(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 15544881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined maxillary and mandibular midline and mandibular ramus distraction osteogenesis for treatment of a Class II patient with implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Takahashi I; Kawamura H; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 20197182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis for severe telescopic bite correction: a report of 2 cases.
    Azumi Y; Sugawara J; Nagasaka H; Kawamura H
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 17902327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non surgical treatment of a Class II malocclusion with skeletal hyperdivergency and anterior open bite.
    Rodriguez Flores JM
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2009; 20(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 19438108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distraction osteogenesis for mandibular advancement.
    van Strijen PJ; Perdijk FB; Becking AG; Breuning KH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 29(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10833141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 1998 C.T. Rowland Award orthodontic case report.
    Gibson JM
    Tex Dent J; 1999 Oct; 116(10):16-27. PubMed ID: 10860083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Class II malocclusion. Time and cost of a combined orthodontic and surgical treatment].
    Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Jul; 111(7):261-5. PubMed ID: 15315104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The overbite and intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 32(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 14980594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional appliance treatment for bilateral condylar fracture in a pediatric patient.
    Medina AC
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(5):432-7. PubMed ID: 19947140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel approach for treatment of mandibular deficiency with vertical growth pattern.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Rad AT
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(2):23-7. PubMed ID: 22873020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial symmetry after distraction osteogenesis and orthodontic therapy.
    Tehranchi A; Behnia H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 11500656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandibular advancement using an intra-oral osteogenic distraction technique: a report of three clinical cases.
    Mattick CR; Chadwick SM; Morton ME
    J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 28(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 11395524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Interception of a Class 2 division 1 malocclusion using mandibular hyperpropulsion. Cephalometric results].
    Rochon G
    Inf Dent; 1986 Dec; 68(43):4397-401. PubMed ID: 3470257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction of "vario plates" for retention after mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Schwestka-Polly R; Gripp-Rudolph L; Grohmann U; Merten HA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 11307185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis for treatment of extreme mandibular hypoplasia.
    Aoki A; Prahl-Andersen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):848-55. PubMed ID: 18068608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skeletal effects in class II treatment with the functional mandibular advancer (FMA)?
    Kinzinger G; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Nov; 66(6):469-90. PubMed ID: 16331547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.