These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15005038)

  • 1. [Questionnaires--how to reach high response rates?].
    Zwisler JE; Jarbøl DE; Lous J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Feb; 166(7):575-8. PubMed ID: 15005038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [It's possible to increase the response rate to postal questionnaires].
    Eaker S
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Oct; 99(44):4380. PubMed ID: 12469586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.
    Edwards P; Roberts I; Clarke M; DiGuiseppi C; Pratap S; Wentz R; Kwan I
    BMJ; 2002 May; 324(7347):1183. PubMed ID: 12016181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limitations of randomized clinical trials in chronic diseases: explanations and recommendations.
    Pincus T
    Adv Mind Body Med; 2002; 18(2):14-21. PubMed ID: 12629874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tone of postcards in increasing survey response rates.
    Price JH; Yingling F; Walsh E; Murnan J; Dake JA
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Apr; 94(2):444-8. PubMed ID: 15154170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: A randomized study of back school in women with chronic low back pain. Quality of life at three, six, and twelve months follow-up.
    Padua R; Bondi R; Ceccarelli E; Alviti F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1336. PubMed ID: 19455011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unexpected mailed survey response rates.
    Riesenberg LA; Rosenbaum P; Stick SL
    Fam Med; 2006 Feb; 38(2):83. PubMed ID: 16450224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A meta-analytic approach to determine the state of the science on implant dentistry.
    Proskin HM; Jeffcoat RL; Catlin A; Campbell J; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():11-8. PubMed ID: 18437789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing return rates of a mail survey to exercise professionals using a modest monetary incentive.
    Hare S; Price JH; Flynn MG; King KA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Feb; 86(1):217-8. PubMed ID: 9530736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
    Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: "Increasing response to mailed questionnaires by including a pencil/pen".
    Sacco P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 164(3):296. PubMed ID: 16777928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximising response to postal surveys of adult dental health.
    McCloskey MI
    Community Dent Health; 1995 Dec; 12(4):244. PubMed ID: 8536091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: is it good or bad?].
    Candia B R; Letelier S LM; Rada G G
    Rev Med Chil; 2006 Nov; 134(11):1470-5. PubMed ID: 17679173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survey response inducements for registered nurses.
    Hill CA; Fahrney K; Wheeless SC; Carson CP
    West J Nurs Res; 2006 Apr; 28(3):322-34. PubMed ID: 16585808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data handling, statistical computing, and archiving.
    Ranstam J
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1137-9. PubMed ID: 18608011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planning a cluster randomized controlled trial: methodological issues.
    Christie J; O'Halloran P; Stevenson M
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19289934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistics notes: missing outcomes in randomised trials.
    Vickers AJ; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2013 Jun; 346():f3438. PubMed ID: 23744649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chapter IV. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports.
    Mathiowetz NA; Groves RM
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):26-32. PubMed ID: 15791753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-tailed tests and a statistical significance at 0.05: what do they mean?
    Campbell M
    Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15177857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The analysis of clinical studies: comparison of means, part I.
    Debanne SM; Rowland DY
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jul; 54(1):142-4. PubMed ID: 11427875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.