These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15005511)
1. [Biology and justice]. Nadal JL J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):327-8. PubMed ID: 15005511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Think-tank calls for an end to DNA deception. Adam D Nature; 2002 May; 417(6887):370. PubMed ID: 12024182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Advancing justice for sexual assault survivors and innocent inmates, or threat to privacy? A controversial DNA technology proposal. Hackenschmidt A J Emerg Nurs; 2004 Dec; 30(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 15565046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Forensic databases: implications of the cases of S and Marper. Hepple B Med Sci Law; 2009 Apr; 49(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19537444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice. Juengst ET Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Forensic DNA data banks: considerations for the health sector. Lakra R; Dimitriadis F Health Law Can; 2002 Feb; 22(3):57-70. PubMed ID: 11915589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnosis of HIV infections in legal regulations]. Zaba C; Zaba Z; Klimberg A; Swiderski P Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(1):118-21. PubMed ID: 17571515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Crime and punishment. Opar A Nat Med; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1110-1. PubMed ID: 17024196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comment: DNA as property: implications on the constitutionality of DNA dragnets. Will JF Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2003; 65(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 15568272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Have the police hijacked our DNA? Lancet; 2003 Sep; 362(9388):927. PubMed ID: 14511920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic privacy: there ought to be a law. Annas GJ Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15706718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Privacy of genetic information. Setoyama K Osaka Univ Law Rev; 2005 Feb; 52():75-105. PubMed ID: 16482694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA databanks, public opinion and the law. Caulfield T; Outerbridge T Clin Invest Med; 2002 Dec; 25(6):252-6. PubMed ID: 12516996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical examination, certification and informed consent. Ray I J Indian Med Assoc; 1993 Nov; 91(11):293-4. PubMed ID: 8138654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Genetic fingerprints and computerised databases]. Sabatier M J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 15005514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When privacy fails: invoking a property paradigm to mandate the destruction of DNA samples. Harlan LM Duke Law J; 2004 Oct; 53(7):179-219. PubMed ID: 15736315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic information and the importance of context: implications for the social meaning of genetic information and individual identity. Gatter KM St Louis Univ Law J; 2003; 47(2):423-62. PubMed ID: 15478258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [DNA profile in legal practice]. Doutremépuich F; Beaufils M; Morales V; Doutremépuich C J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):329-31. PubMed ID: 15005512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]