447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15005678)
1. A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses.
Aakre BM; Ystenaes AE; Doughty MJ; Austrheim Ø; Westerfjell B; Lie MT
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Mar; 24(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 15005678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
Dumbleton K; Keir N; Moezzi A; Feng Y; Jones L; Fonn D
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 17041322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term adaptation of the human corneal endothelium to continuous wear of silicone hydrogel (lotrafilcon A) contact lenses after daily hydrogel lens wear.
Doughty MJ; Aakre BM; Ystenaes AE; Svarverud E
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):473-80. PubMed ID: 15976584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear.
Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB; Efron N; Efron S
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):536-48. PubMed ID: 15976592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule.
Brennan NA; Coles ML; Comstock TL; Levy B
Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1172-7. PubMed ID: 12045062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corneal endothelial morphology results in the Menicon Z 30-day continuous-wear contact lens clinical trial.
Barr JT; Pall B; Szczotka LB; Mitchell GL; Gleason W
Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jan; 29(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 12769149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal shape changes induced by first and second generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses in daily wear.
Alba-Bueno F; Beltran-Masgoret A; Sanjuan C; Biarnés M; Marín J
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Apr; 32(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 19181564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term clinical results: 3 years of up to 30-night continuous wear of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel and daily wear of low-Dk/t hydrogel lenses.
Bergenske P; Long B; Dillehay S; Barr JT; Donshik P; Secor G; Yoakum J; Chalmers RL
Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 17496699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ocular physiology and comfort in neophyte subjects fitted with daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
Morgan PB; Chamberlain P; Moody K; Maldonado-Codina C
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Jun; 36(3):118-25. PubMed ID: 23279732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Objective Assessment of Ocular Surface Response to Contact Lens Wear in Presbyopic Contact Lens Wearers of Asian Descent.
Guillon M; Dumbleton K; Theodoratos P; Patel T; Karkkainen T; Moody K
Eye Contact Lens; 2018 May; 44(3):182-189. PubMed ID: 27755285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Refractive and biometric changes with silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
Santodomingo-Rubido J; Gilmartin B; Wolffsohn J
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):481-9. PubMed ID: 15976585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a).
Riley C; Young G; Chalmers R
Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Dec; 32(6):281-6. PubMed ID: 17099389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics, and symptomatology with 18 months silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
Santodomingo-Rubido J; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16501408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers.
Dillehay SM; Miller MB
Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):272-7. PubMed ID: 17993820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft daily disposable contact lenses in neophyte wearers.
Wolffsohn JS; Dhirajlal H; Vianya-Estopa M; Nagra M; Madden L; Sweeney LE; Goodyear AS; Kerr LV; Terry L; Sheikh S; Murphy O; Lloyd A; Maldonado-Codina C;
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Jun; 43(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 31543407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Daily versus monthly disposable contact lens: Which is better for ocular surface physiology and comfort?
Sapkota K; Franco S; Lira M
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Jun; 41(3):252-257. PubMed ID: 29221708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multisite comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional daily wear in successful contact lens wearers.
Nason RJ; Boshnick EL; Cannon WM; Dubow BW; Freeman MI; Kame RT; Lanier JC; Lopanik RW; Quinn TG; Rigel LE
J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Nov; 65(11):774-80. PubMed ID: 7822675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Daily disposable vs. disposable extended wear: a contact lens clinical trial.
Nichols JJ; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Dec; 77(12):637-47. PubMed ID: 11147733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The ocular response to extended wear of a high Dk silicone hydrogel contact lens.
Fonn D; MacDonald KE; Richter D; Pritchard N
Clin Exp Optom; 2002 May; 85(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 12033980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Daily Wear Contact Lenses Manufactured in Etafilcon A Are Noninferior to Two Silicone Hydrogel Lens Types With Respect to Hypoxic Stress.
Szczotka-Flynn LB; Debanne S; Benetz BA; Wilson T; Brennan N
Eye Contact Lens; 2018 May; 44(3):190-199. PubMed ID: 27768615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
