These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15006015)

  • 1. The need for trial identifiers.
    Wager E
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004; 20(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 15006015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing publication bias through trial registration.
    Abaid LN; Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1434-7. PubMed ID: 17540818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Duplicate publication a way of embellishing research results. Unethical misuse which threatens the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
    Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3454-6. PubMed ID: 11037585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing publication bias of prospective clinical trials through trial registration.
    Abaid LN; Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Contraception; 2007 Nov; 76(5):339-41. PubMed ID: 17963856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Producing systematic reviews of best quality: a prerequisite for evidence-based nephrology.
    Fouque D
    J Nephrol; 1999; 12(5):314-7. PubMed ID: 10630695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positive reasons for publishing negative findings.
    Connor JT
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 103(9):2181-3. PubMed ID: 18671812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials.
    Liebeskind DS; Kidwell CS; Sayre JW; Saver JL
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(6):973-9. PubMed ID: 17000963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tackling publication bias and selective reporting in health informatics research: register your eHealth trials in the International eHealth Studies Registry.
    Eysenbach G
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e35. PubMed ID: 15471761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical research projects at a German medical faculty: follow-up from ethical approval to publication and citation by others.
    Blümle A; Antes G; Schumacher M; Just H; von Elm E
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):e20. PubMed ID: 18757621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some problems with Cochrane reviews of diet and chronic disease.
    Truswell AS
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Aug; 59 Suppl 1():S150-4; discussion S195-6. PubMed ID: 16052203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
    Turpin DL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
    Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
    Phys Ther; 2009 Sep; 89(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 19723669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Method guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group systematic reviews.
    Maxwell L; Santesso N; Tugwell PS; Wells GA; Judd M; Buchbinder R
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Nov; 33(11):2304-11. PubMed ID: 17086611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The iceberg phenomenon and publication bias: the editors' fault?
    Boissel JP; Haugh MC
    Clin Trials Metaanal; 1993 Nov; 28(6):309-15. PubMed ID: 10150179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Akobeng AK
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Aug; 90(8):845-8. PubMed ID: 16040886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.