These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15006176)

  • 1. Spectacles, distinctiveness, and face recognition: a web-based experiment.
    Metzger M; Bridges KR
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2004 Feb; 7(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 15006176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognizing unfamiliar faces: the effects of distinctiveness and view.
    Newell FN; Chiroro P; Valentine T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):509-34. PubMed ID: 10428688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive mechanisms of false facial recognition in older adults.
    Edmonds EC; Glisky EL; Bartlett JC; Rapcsak SZ
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21787088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Face distinctiveness and delayed testing: differential effects on performance and confidence.
    Metzger MM
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Apr; 133(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 16705913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From theory to implementation: building a multidimensional space for face recognition.
    Catz O; Kampf M; Nachson I; Babkoff H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 19403107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Familiarity breeds attraction: effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces.
    Peskin M; Newell FN
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 15109158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is face distinctiveness gender based?
    Baudouin JY; Gallay M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):789-98. PubMed ID: 16846279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Face value: testing the utility of contextual face cues for face recognition.
    Tupper N; Sauer JD; Sauerland M; Fu I; Hope L
    Memory; 2018 Nov; 26(10):1436-1449. PubMed ID: 29932823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of attractiveness on face memory separated from distinctiveness: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Wiese H; Altmann CS; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():26-36. PubMed ID: 24406982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Smiling emphasizes perceived distinctiveness of faces.
    Kawamura S; Komori M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Aug; 107(1):119-20. PubMed ID: 18986039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized.
    Wickham LH; Morris PE
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(3):455-68. PubMed ID: 14503395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness.
    Leder H; Bruce V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Aug; 51(3):449-73. PubMed ID: 9745377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognizing distinctive faces: a hybrid-similarity exemplar model account.
    Knapp BR; Nosofsky RM; Busey TA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jun; 34(4):877-89. PubMed ID: 17063918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of experimental design on memory for typical and distinctive faces.
    Hosie JA; Milne AB
    Memory; 1996 Mar; 4(2):175-97. PubMed ID: 8697036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory.
    Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Hansen K
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2973-85. PubMed ID: 18602408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Faces forming traces: neurophysiological correlates of learning naturally distinctive and caricatured faces.
    Schulz C; Kaufmann JM; Kurt A; Schweinberger SR
    Neuroimage; 2012 Oct; 63(1):491-500. PubMed ID: 22796993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences for the recognition of direct versus averted gaze faces.
    Goodman LR; Phelan HL; Johnson SA
    Memory; 2012; 20(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 22292806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual processing of facial distinctiveness.
    Benson PJ; Perrett DI
    Perception; 1994; 23(1):75-93. PubMed ID: 7936978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors' faces: evidence from a false recognition paradigm.
    Todorov A; Uleman JS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Nov; 83(5):1051-65. PubMed ID: 12416911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of familiarity in a face classification task using thatcherized faces.
    Stevenage SV; Lee EA; Donnelly N
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):1103-18. PubMed ID: 16194950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.