These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15006240)

  • 21. [Empirical research of measuring elderly health utility in the outskirts of Beijing by using European quality of life 5-dimensions].
    Wu YQ; Liu K; Tang X; Cao Y; Wang JW; Li N; Liu JJ; Yu LP; Xu HT; Liu WJ; Wen SS; Hu YH; Li K
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Jun; 44(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 22692310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The time trade-off method: results from a general population study.
    Dolan P; Gudex C; Kind P; Williams A
    Health Econ; 1996; 5(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 8733106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. QALY weights for diabetic retinopathy--a comparison of health state valuations with HUI-3, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and TTO.
    Heintz E; Wiréhn AB; Peebo BB; Rosenqvist U; Levin LÅ
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 22583458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic.
    Dolan P; Stalmeier P
    J Health Econ; 2003 May; 22(3):445-58. PubMed ID: 12683961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. QALYs without bias? Nonparametric correction of time trade-off and standard gamble weights based on prospect theory.
    Lipman SA; Brouwer WBF; Attema AE
    Health Econ; 2019 Jul; 28(7):843-854. PubMed ID: 31237093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Health values of patients with systemic sclerosis.
    Khanna D; Ahmed M; Furst DE; Ginsburg SS; Park GS; Hornung R; Tsevat J
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Feb; 57(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17266070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Time trade-off and ranking exercises are sensitive to different dimensions of EQ-5D health states.
    Rand-Hendriksen K; Augestad LA
    Value Health; 2012; 15(5):777-82. PubMed ID: 22867789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L.
    Ramos-Goñi JM; Rand-Hendriksen K; Pinto-Prades JL
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 27325340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Challenges to time trade-off utility assessment methods: when should you consider alternative approaches?
    Boye KS; Matza LS; Feeny DH; Johnston JA; Bowman L; Jordan JB
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Jun; 14(3):437-50. PubMed ID: 24832003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Valuation of EQ-5D health states in Poland: first TTO-based social value set in Central and Eastern Europe.
    Golicki D; Jakubczyk M; Niewada M; Wrona W; Busschbach JJ
    Value Health; 2010; 13(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 19744296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An Empirical Study of Two Alternative Comparators for Use in Time Trade-Off Studies.
    Shah K; Mulhern B; Longworth L; Janssen MF
    Value Health; 2016 Jan; 19(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 26797236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
    Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
    Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of subjective expectations about length and quality of life on time trade-off answers.
    van Nooten F; Brouwer W
    Health Econ; 2004 Aug; 13(8):819-23. PubMed ID: 15322993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Lin MR; Yu WY; Wang SC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22289233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality of life of young adults and adolescents with chronic kidney disease.
    Tong A; Wong G; McTaggart S; Henning P; Mackie F; Carroll RP; Howard K; Craig JC
    J Pediatr; 2013 Oct; 163(4):1179-85.e5. PubMed ID: 23800404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risk attitudes to treatment among patients with severe intermittent claudication.
    Letterstål A; Forsberg C; Olofsson P; Wahlberg E
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 May; 47(5):988-94. PubMed ID: 18455642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality-adjusted life year weights among elderly patients with heart failure.
    Alehagen U; Rahmqvist M; Paulsson T; Levin LA
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2008 Oct; 10(10):1033-9. PubMed ID: 18760669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Health State Utilities for Patient's Current Health from Bipolar Type I Disorder.
    Banihashemian M; Rashidian A; Gholamian F; Parsaeian M; Moradi N; Amini H
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 29643263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lead time TTO: leading to better health state valuations?
    Attema AE; Versteegh MM; Oppe M; Brouwer WB; Stolk EA
    Health Econ; 2013 Apr; 22(4):376-92. PubMed ID: 22396243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Individual differences in the use of the response scale determine valuations of hypothetical health states: an empirical study.
    Essink-Bot ML; Stuifbergen MC; Meerding WJ; Looman CW; Bonsel GJ;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Apr; 7():62. PubMed ID: 17466068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.