These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15006427)

  • 21. Analysis of microbial community structure in a biofilm on membrane surface in the submerged membrane bioreactor treating domestic wastewater on the basis of respiratory quinone profiles.
    Lim BR; Ahn KH
    J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2004 Aug; 50(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 15754245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors.
    De Wever H; Van Roy S; Dotremont C; Miller J; Knepper T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modeling of the Contact-Adsorption-Regeneration (CAR) activated sludge process.
    Liu SG; Ni BJ; Li WW; Sheng GP; Tang Y; Yu HQ
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Feb; 102(3):2199-205. PubMed ID: 20980144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Correlation between membrane fouling and soluble/colloidal organic substances in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Lesjean B; Rosenberger S; Laabs C; Jekel M; Gnirss R; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):1-8. PubMed ID: 16003955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimising operation of a biological wastewater treatment application.
    Murphy RB; Young BR; Kecman V
    ISA Trans; 2009 Jan; 48(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 18762295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of sludge-fly ash ceramic particles (SFCP) on synthetic wastewater treatment in an A/O combined biological aerated filter.
    Han S; Yue Q; Yue M; Gao B; Zhao Y; Cheng W
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Feb; 100(3):1149-55. PubMed ID: 18828988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of controlling factors on the start-up and operation for partial nitrification in membrane bioreactor.
    Xue Y; Yang F; Liu S; Fu Z
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Feb; 100(3):1055-60. PubMed ID: 18778932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of the physical, chemical, and biological properties of sludges from a complete-mix activated sludge reactor and a submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Merlo RP; Trussell RS; Hermanowicz SW; Jenkins D
    Water Environ Res; 2007 Mar; 79(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 17469664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor for the aerobic treatment of abattoir wastewater.
    Keskes S; Hmaied F; Gannoun H; Bouallagui H; Godon JJ; Hamdi M
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Jan; 103(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 22055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative performance between intermittently cyclic activated sludge-membrane bioreactor and anoxic/aerobic-membrane bioreactor.
    Wang YL; Yu SL; Shi WX; Bao RL; Zhao Q; Zuo XT
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Sep; 100(17):3877-81. PubMed ID: 19362820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Control of COD/N ratio for nutrient removal in a modified membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating high strength wastewater.
    Fu Z; Yang F; Zhou F; Xue Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 18640033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biodegradation of persistent polar pollutants in wastewater: comparison of an optimised lab-scale membrane bioreactor and activated sludge treatment.
    Bernhard M; Müller J; Knepper TP
    Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(18):3419-28. PubMed ID: 16962630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Membrane bioreactor versus conventional activated sludge system: population dynamics of nitrifiers.
    Manser R; Gujer W; Siegrist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):417-25. PubMed ID: 16459817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
    De Wever H; Weiss S; Reemtsma T; Vereecken J; Müller J; Knepper T; Rörden O; Gonzalez S; Barcelo D; Dolores Hernando M
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of PAC addition on sludge properties in an MBR treating high strength wastewater.
    Satyawali Y; Balakrishnan M
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1577-88. PubMed ID: 19201006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short-cut nitrification of domestic wastewater in a pilot-scale A/O nitrogen removal plant.
    Wang X; Ma Y; Peng Y; Wang S
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2007 Mar; 30(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 17225994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Change of microbial community structure by respiratory quinone profile at intermittently aerated membrane bioreactor.
    Songprasert P; Lim BR; Ahn KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):459-65. PubMed ID: 15137458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sustainable membrane operation design for the treatment of the synthetic coke wastewater in SMBR.
    Zhou Y; Xu ZL; Munib S; Chen GE; Lu Q
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2115-24. PubMed ID: 19844058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative analysis of biological effect on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Cho J; Song KG; Yun H; Ahn KH; Kim JY; Chung TH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):9-18. PubMed ID: 16003956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Decay processes of nitrifying bacteria in biological wastewater treatment systems.
    Manser R; Gujer W; Siegrist H
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2416-26. PubMed ID: 16753196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.