BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15007441)

  • 1. Hydrodynamic simulation of cell docking in microfluidic channels with different dam structures.
    Yang J; Li CW; Yang M
    Lab Chip; 2004 Feb; 4(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 15007441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulation of two-dimensional fully developed laminar flow for a magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) pump.
    Wang PJ; Chang CY; Chang ML
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2004 Jul; 20(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 15142583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microfluidic delivery of small molecules into mammalian cells based on hydrodynamic focusing.
    Wang F; Wang H; Wang J; Wang HY; Rummel PL; Garimella SV; Lu C
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 May; 100(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 18078299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer simulations of the energy dissipation rate in a fluorescence-activated cell sorter: Implications to cells.
    Mollet M; Godoy-Silva R; Berdugo C; Chalmers JJ
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Jun; 100(2):260-72. PubMed ID: 18078288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microfluidic pool structure for cell docking and rapid mixing.
    Yang J; Yang J; Yin ZQ; Svir I; Xu J; Luo HY; Wang M; Cao Y; Hu N; Liao YJ; Zheng XL
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Feb; 634(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 19154811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Small volume low mechanical stress cytometry using computer-controlled Braille display microfluidics.
    Tung YC; Torisawa YS; Futai N; Takayama S
    Lab Chip; 2007 Nov; 7(11):1497-503. PubMed ID: 17960277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational evaluation of oxygen and shear stress distributions in 3D perfusion culture systems: macro-scale and micro-structured models.
    Cioffi M; Küffer J; Ströbel S; Dubini G; Martin I; Wendt D
    J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):2918-25. PubMed ID: 18789444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cells in 3D matrices under interstitial flow: effects of extracellular matrix alignment on cell shear stress and drag forces.
    Pedersen JA; Lichter S; Swartz MA
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(5):900-5. PubMed ID: 20006339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microfluidics for flow cytometric analysis of cells and particles.
    Huh D; Gu W; Kamotani Y; Grotberg JB; Takayama S
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Jun; 26(3):R73-98. PubMed ID: 15798290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping vortex-like hydrodynamic flow in microfluidic networks using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.
    Liu K; Tian Y; Burrows SM; Reif RD; Pappas D
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Sep; 651(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 19733740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of hydrodynamic conditions on quantitative cellular assays in microfluidic systems.
    Yin H; Zhang X; Pattrick N; Klauke N; Cordingley HC; Haswell SJ; Cooper JM
    Anal Chem; 2007 Sep; 79(18):7139-44. PubMed ID: 17658886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mass transport and shear stress in a microchannel bioreactor: numerical simulation and dynamic similarity.
    Zeng Y; Lee TS; Yu P; Roy P; Low HT
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Apr; 128(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 16524329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomimetic design of microfluidic manifolds based on a generalised Murray's law.
    Emerson DR; Cieślicki K; Gu X; Barber RW
    Lab Chip; 2006 Mar; 6(3):447-54. PubMed ID: 16511629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electroosmotic guiding of sample flows in a laminar flow chamber.
    Besselink GA; Vulto P; Lammertink RG; Schlautmann S; van den Berg A; Olthuis W; Engbers GH; Schasfoort RB
    Electrophoresis; 2004 Nov; 25(21-22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 15565693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cell immersion and cell dipping in microfluidic devices.
    Seger U; Gawad S; Johann R; Bertsch A; Renaud P
    Lab Chip; 2004 Apr; 4(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 15052356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical and experimental evaluation of microfluidic sorting devices.
    Taylor JK; Ren CL; Stubley GD
    Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(4):981-91. PubMed ID: 19194907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nanoliter scale microbioreactor array for quantitative cell biology.
    Lee PJ; Hung PJ; Rao VM; Lee LP
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 May; 94(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 16315325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design of well and groove microchannel bioreactors for cell culture.
    Korin N; Bransky A; Khoury M; Dinnar U; Levenberg S
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2009 Mar; 102(4):1222-30. PubMed ID: 18973280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic shear stress in parallel-plate flow chambers.
    Bacabac RG; Smit TH; Cowin SC; Van Loon JJ; Nieuwstadt FT; Heethaar R; Klein-Nulend J
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 15519352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vascular mimetics based on microfluidics for imaging the leukocyte--endothelial inflammatory response.
    Schaff UY; Xing MM; Lin KK; Pan N; Jeon NL; Simon SI
    Lab Chip; 2007 Apr; 7(4):448-56. PubMed ID: 17389960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.