210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15007586)
1. Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.
Drewing K; Stenneken P; Cole J; Prinz W; Aschersleben G
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 15007586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The contribution of tactile reafference to temporal regularity during bimanual finger tapping.
Drewing K; Hennings M; Aschersleben G
Psychol Res; 2002 Feb; 66(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 11963279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduced timing variability during bimanual coupling: a role for sensory information.
Drewing K; Aschersleben G
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):329-50. PubMed ID: 12613567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-induced versus reactive triggering of synchronous movements in a deafferented patient and control subjects.
Stenneken P; Aschersleben G; Cole J; Prinz W
Psychol Res; 2002 Feb; 66(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11963277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bimanual circling in deafferented patients: evidence for a role of visual forward models.
Mechsner F; Stenneken P; Cole J; Aschersleben G; Prinz W
J Neuropsychol; 2007 Sep; 1(2):259-82. PubMed ID: 19331020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is proprioception important for the timing of motor activities?
LaRue J; Bard C; Fleury M; Teasdale N; Paillard J; Forget R; Lamarre Y
Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1995 Feb; 73(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 7621364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preserved and impaired aspects of feed-forward grip force control after chronic somatosensory deafferentation.
Hermsdörfer J; Elias Z; Cole JD; Quaney BM; Nowak DA
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(4):374-84. PubMed ID: 18223241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual feedback is not important for bimanual human interval timing.
Studenka BE; Cummins DL; Myers K
Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):857-864. PubMed ID: 31982935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of multiple internal timekeepers and sources of feedback on interval timing.
Studenka BE; Cummins DL; Pope MA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):1960-1967. PubMed ID: 28854855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intercerebellar coupling contributes to bimanual coordination.
Pollok B; Butz M; Gross J; Schnitzler A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 19(4):704-19. PubMed ID: 17381260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When two hands are better than one: reduced timing variability during bimanual movements.
Helmuth LL; Ivry RB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Apr; 22(2):278-93. PubMed ID: 8934844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Goal synchronization of bimanual skills depends on proprioception.
Kazennikov OV; Wiesendanger M
Neurosci Lett; 2005 Nov; 388(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 16039778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of sensory information in the production of periodic finger-tapping sequences.
Billon M; Semjen A; Cole J; Gauthier G
Exp Brain Res; 1996 Jun; 110(1):117-30. PubMed ID: 8817263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-component models of reaching: evidence from deafferentation in a Fitts' law task.
Medina J; Jax SA; Coslett HB
Neurosci Lett; 2009 Feb; 451(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 19150390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interval timing and trajectory in unequal amplitude movements.
Doumas M; Wing AM; Wood K
Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 189(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 18483723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Specific neocerebellar activation during out-of-phase bimanual movements.
Habas C; Axelrad H; Nguyen TH; Cabanis EA
Neuroreport; 2004 Mar; 15(4):595-9. PubMed ID: 15094459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Updating of an internal model without proprioception: a deafferentation study.
Bernier PM; Chua R; Bard C; Franks IM
Neuroreport; 2006 Sep; 17(13):1421-5. PubMed ID: 16932151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contribution of tactile information to accuracy in pointing movements.
Rao AK; Gordon AM
Exp Brain Res; 2001 Jun; 138(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 11465741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bimanual coordination during rhythmic movements in the absence of somatosensory feedback.
Spencer RM; Ivry RB; Cattaert D; Semjen A
J Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 94(4):2901-10. PubMed ID: 16014794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Further insight into the task-dependent excitability of motor evoked potentials in first dorsal interosseous muscle in humans.
Hasegawa Y; Kasai T; Tsuji T; Yahagi S
Exp Brain Res; 2001 Oct; 140(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 11685391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
