595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15008173)
1. Ethical decision making in committee: the role of review boards and ethics committees in health care, health policy, and medical research.
Sass HM
Taiwan Yi Xue Ren Wen Xue Kan; 2000 Nov; 1(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 15008173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical decision making in committee. A view from Germany.
Sass HM
Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):65-81. PubMed ID: 15282922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Organized medicine bows out of ethics committee race.
Med World News; 1983 Jun; 24(11):18-9. PubMed ID: 11645500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Will the real bioethics (commission) please stand up?
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 8045761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Czech central ethics committee at work.
Kment M; Haskovcova H
Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Oct; No. 92():16-9. PubMed ID: 11652227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting and promoting the human research subject: a review of the function of research ethics boards in Canadian faculties of medicine.
National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada). Working Group on Evaluation
NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 11654937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics committees flourish in Europe.
Barthelemy JE
IME bull; 1988 Jun; No. 39():13-21. PubMed ID: 11650071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioethics committees as consensus shapers.
Rosen E
Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Feb; No. 145():13-8. PubMed ID: 11657250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
Dhai A
Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. At law. Ethics committees: from ethical comfort to ethical cover.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(3):18-21. PubMed ID: 1885292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics committees in the United States.
Capron AM
Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):87-94. PubMed ID: 15282924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A survey of university institutional review boards: characteristics, policies, and procedures.
Hayes GJ; Hayes SC; Dykstra T
IRB; 1995; 17(3):1-6. PubMed ID: 11654267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Science, politics, and federal advisory committees.
Steinbrook R
N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(14):1454-60. PubMed ID: 15070798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. France: a national committee debates the issues.
Ambroselli C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Dec; 14(6):20-1. PubMed ID: 6511372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An enhanced methodology for conflicts in ethics consultation.
Whisnand D
Clin Ethics Rep; 1995-1996 Winter; 9(4):1-11. PubMed ID: 11660150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Hastings Center Project on Imperiled Newborns: supreme court, jury, or Greek chorus?
Lantos JD
Pediatrics; 1989 Apr; 83(4):615-6. PubMed ID: 2928005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Local research ethics committees. Oxford committee was concerned that trial might be unethical.
Talbot D; Reynolds DJ
BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7120):1464. PubMed ID: 9418109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Governing population genomics: law, bioethics, and biopolitics in three case studies.
Winickoff DE
Jurimetrics; 2003; 43(2):187-228. PubMed ID: 15156881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Credibility, persuasiveness, and effectiveness.
King PA
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1996 Sep; 6(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 11653401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomedical ethics committees.
Cranford RE; Roberts JC
Prim Care; 1986 Jun; 13(2):327-41. PubMed ID: 3636935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
