245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15008234)
1. Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping.
Coli P; Karlsson S
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 15008234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision of a CAD/CAM technique for the production of zirconium dioxide copings.
Coli P; Karlsson S
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):577-80. PubMed ID: 15543914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of convergence angle and cement space on adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings.
Iwai T; Komine F; Kobayashi K; Saito A; Matsumura H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 18607834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings.
Moldovan O; Luthardt RG; Corcodel N; Rudolph H
Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1273-8. PubMed ID: 21983002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing.
Luthardt RG; Bornemann G; Lemelson S; Walter MH; Hüls A
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 15686096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems.
Balkaya MC; Cinar A; Pamuk S
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):346-55. PubMed ID: 15798685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques.
Witkowski S; Komine F; Gerds T
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16872930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vertical marginal and internal adaptation of all-ceramic copings made by CAD/CAM technology.
Al-Rabab'ah MA; Macfarlane TV; McCord JF
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Sep; 16(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 19051552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers.
Beuer F; Aggstaller H; Edelhoff D; Gernet W; Sorensen J
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18620749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers.
Beuer F; Neumeier P; Naumann M
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 36(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 18976261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Li J; Borchers L; Stiesch M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
