These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15008452)

  • 1. Accuracy of clinical and radiological classification of the jawbone anatomy for implantation--a survey of 374 patients.
    Juodzbalys G; Raustia AM
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 15008452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant-prosthodontic classification of the edentulous jaw for treatment planning with fixed rehabilitations.
    Papadimitriou DE; Salari S; Gannam C; Gallucci GO; Friedland B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 25010874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of alveolar ridge width in dental implantology.
    Eufinger H; König S; Eufinger A
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Dec; 1(4):169-77. PubMed ID: 9555213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative estimation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular jawbones in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects.
    Panchbhai AS
    Spec Care Dentist; 2013; 33(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 23451926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants.
    Truhlar RS; Orenstein IH; Morris HF; Ochi S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Dec; 55(12 Suppl 5):38-45. PubMed ID: 9393425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Site classification for the osseointegrated implant.
    Jensen O
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 2654368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of the possibility to treat the edentulous maxilla with osseointegrated implants.
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Carlsson LE
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 1579883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complete arch site classification for all-on-4 immediate function.
    Jensen OT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):741-51.e2. PubMed ID: 24831746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity and specificity of radiographic methods for predicting insertion torque of dental implants.
    Cortes AR; Eimar H; Barbosa Jde S; Costa C; Arita ES; Tamimi F
    J Periodontol; 2015 May; 86(5):646-55. PubMed ID: 25594426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative bone width of the edentulous maxillary ridge. Clinical implications of digital assessment in presurgical implant planning.
    Katsoulis J; Enkling N; Takeichi T; Urban IA; Mericske-Stern R; Avrampou M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e213-23. PubMed ID: 22375945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A restoratively driven ridge categorization, as determined by incorporating ideal restorative positions on radiographic templates utilizing computed tomography scan analysis.
    Elian N; Ehrlich B; Jalbout Z; Cho SC; Froum S; Tarnow D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 18783410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between planned prosthetic and residual bone trajectories in dental implants.
    Almog DM; Sanchez R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 10220660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sonographic measurement versus mapping for determination of residual ridge width.
    Traxler M; Ulm C; Solar P; Lill W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 1507101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing Bone Type of Implant Recipient Sites by Stereomicroscopic Observation of Bone Core Specimens: A Comparison With the Assessment Using Dental Radiography.
    Fu MW; Shen EC; Fu E; Lin FG; Wang TY; Chiu HC
    J Periodontol; 2017 Jun; 88(6):593-601. PubMed ID: 28398151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of treatment with non-submerged ITI implants.
    Bergkvist G; Sahlholm S; Nilner K; Lindh C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 15142099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Turned Brånemark System implants in wide and narrow edentulous maxillae: a retrospective clinical study.
    Friberg B; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 18462203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
    Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.