These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15008464)

  • 21. Recruitment strategies for research.
    Cross PL; Parsons S; Letley L
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jul; 53(492):568. PubMed ID: 14694681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sources of bias in research design.
    Thompson CB; Panacek EA
    Air Med J; 2007; 26(4):166-8. PubMed ID: 17603943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.
    Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S
    Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Research and fantasy].
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 May; 127(11):1489. PubMed ID: 17551547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of the impact factor in biomedical research: its use and misuse.
    Kumar V; Upadhyay S; Medhi B
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Aug; 50(8):752-5. PubMed ID: 19710969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Small study on industry trial sponsorship leads to big questions about quality and bias.
    Twombly R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Jul; 99(13):988-90. PubMed ID: 17596566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acknowledging and Overcoming Nonreproducibility in Basic and Preclinical Research.
    Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2017 Mar; 317(10):1019-1020. PubMed ID: 28192565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 1. Concepts and definitions.
    Goodacre S
    Emerg Med J; 2008 Apr; 25(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 18356354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perfect study, poor evidence: interpretation of biases preceding study design.
    Ioannidis JP
    Semin Hematol; 2008 Jul; 45(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 18582622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Using clinical epidemiology to improve the quality of clinical research articles].
    Zhang ZY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Dec; 12(6):401-2. PubMed ID: 14974375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!
    Heddle NM; Ness P
    Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validity of Canadian studies: Author's response.
    Chandra RK
    BMJ; 2004 Feb; 328(7437):465; discussion 465. PubMed ID: 14976121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating clinical information: the role of the review article.
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007; 46(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 17761315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Data rising from the East.
    Watts G
    BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d7480. PubMed ID: 22144409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start.
    Thomas L; Peterson ED
    JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(8):773-4. PubMed ID: 22910753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is it time for sports performance researchers to adopt a clinical-type research framework?
    Atkinson G; Batterham A; Drust B
    Int J Sports Med; 2008 Sep; 29(9):703-5. PubMed ID: 18683107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A defence of rigorous method in clinical science.
    Malone-Lee J
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(6):462-5. PubMed ID: 18508330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice.
    Zlowodzki M; Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Tornetta P; Bhandari M;
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 17966018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Power and consequences: statistical planning in clinical research studies.
    Bena JF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 94(9):1115. PubMed ID: 20813750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Better reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Pai M; Sharma S
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 23(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 16327114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.