These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15008464)
21. Recruitment strategies for research. Cross PL; Parsons S; Letley L Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jul; 53(492):568. PubMed ID: 14694681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Sources of bias in research design. Thompson CB; Panacek EA Air Med J; 2007; 26(4):166-8. PubMed ID: 17603943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist. Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Research and fantasy]. Haug C Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 May; 127(11):1489. PubMed ID: 17551547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of the impact factor in biomedical research: its use and misuse. Kumar V; Upadhyay S; Medhi B Singapore Med J; 2009 Aug; 50(8):752-5. PubMed ID: 19710969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Small study on industry trial sponsorship leads to big questions about quality and bias. Twombly R J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Jul; 99(13):988-90. PubMed ID: 17596566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Acknowledging and Overcoming Nonreproducibility in Basic and Preclinical Research. Ioannidis JP JAMA; 2017 Mar; 317(10):1019-1020. PubMed ID: 28192565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 1. Concepts and definitions. Goodacre S Emerg Med J; 2008 Apr; 25(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 18356354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating clinical information: the role of the review article. Malay DS J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007; 46(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 17761315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Data rising from the East. Watts G BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d7480. PubMed ID: 22144409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start. Thomas L; Peterson ED JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(8):773-4. PubMed ID: 22910753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Is it time for sports performance researchers to adopt a clinical-type research framework? Atkinson G; Batterham A; Drust B Int J Sports Med; 2008 Sep; 29(9):703-5. PubMed ID: 18683107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A defence of rigorous method in clinical science. Malone-Lee J Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(6):462-5. PubMed ID: 18508330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. How to interpret a meta-analysis and judge its value as a guide for clinical practice. Zlowodzki M; Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Tornetta P; Bhandari M; Acta Orthop; 2007 Oct; 78(5):598-609. PubMed ID: 17966018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Power and consequences: statistical planning in clinical research studies. Bena JF Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 94(9):1115. PubMed ID: 20813750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Better reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. Pai M; Sharma S Indian J Med Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 23(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 16327114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]