These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15008644)

  • 1. Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.".
    Cesario J; Grant H; Higgins ET
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Mar; 86(3):388-404. PubMed ID: 15008644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion.
    Lee AY; Aaker JL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 86(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 14769079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Making message recipients "feel right": how nonverbal cues can increase persuasion.
    Cesario J; Higgins ET
    Psychol Sci; 2008 May; 19(5):415-20. PubMed ID: 18466399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong.
    Camacho CJ; Higgins ET; Luger L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):498-510. PubMed ID: 12635912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Briñol P; Petty RE; Valle C; Rucker DD; Becerra A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Dec; 93(6):1040-53. PubMed ID: 18072853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relevance override: on the reduced impact of "cues" under high-motivation conditions of persuasion studies.
    Pierro A; Mannetti L; Kruglanski AW; Sleeth-Keppler D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 86(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 14769082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulatory fit as input for stop rules.
    Vaughn LA; Malik J; Schwartz S; Petkova Z; Trudeau L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Oct; 91(4):601-11. PubMed ID: 17014287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Think" versus "feel" framing effects in persuasion.
    Mayer ND; Tormala ZL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Apr; 36(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 20363901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of message framing, intention to quit smoking, and nicotine dependence on the persuasiveness of smoking cessation messages.
    Moorman M; van den Putte B
    Addict Behav; 2008 Oct; 33(10):1267-75. PubMed ID: 18584971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incidental experiences of regulatory fit and the processing of persuasive appeals.
    Koenig AM; Cesario J; Molden DC; Kosloff S; Higgins ET
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1342-55. PubMed ID: 19571272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When the model fits the frame: the impact of regulatory fit on efficacy appraisal and persuasion in health communication.
    Bosone L; Martinez F; Kalampalikis N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Apr; 41(4):526-39. PubMed ID: 25680684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does regulatory fit lead to more effective health communication? A systematic review.
    Ludolph R; Schulz PJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 128():142-50. PubMed ID: 25617673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When 'fit' leads to fit, and when 'fit' leads to fat: how message framing and intrinsic vs. extrinsic exercise outcomes interact in promoting physical activity.
    Gallagher KM; Updegraff JA
    Psychol Health; 2011 Jul; 26(7):819-34. PubMed ID: 21432731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Persuading drivers to refrain from speeding: Effects of message sidedness and regulatory fit.
    Pierro A; Giacomantonio M; Pica G; Giannini AM; Kruglanski AW; Higgins ET
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():917-25. PubMed ID: 22882878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrete emotions and persuasion: the role of emotion-induced expectancies.
    DeSteno D; Petty RE; Rucker DD; Wegener DT; Braverman J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jan; 86(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 14717627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The persuasive effects of framing messages on fruit and vegetable consumption according to regulatory focus theory.
    Dijkstra A; Rothman A; Pietersma S
    Psychol Health; 2011 Aug; 26(8):1036-48. PubMed ID: 21598188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Promoting exercise behaviour: an integration of persuasion theories and the theory of planned behaviour.
    Jones LW; Sinclair RC; Rhodes RE; Courneya KS
    Br J Health Psychol; 2004 Nov; 9(Pt 4):505-21. PubMed ID: 15509358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-generated persuasion: effects of the target and direction of arguments.
    Briñol P; McCaslin MJ; Petty RE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 May; 102(5):925-40. PubMed ID: 22352326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do hedonic motives moderate regulatory focus motives? Evidence from the framing of persuasive messages.
    Malaviya P; Brendl CM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Jan; 106(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 24377359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.