These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15008651)

  • 1. Appearing truthful generalizes across different deception situations.
    Frank MG; Ekman P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Mar; 86(3):486-95. PubMed ID: 15008651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies.
    Frank MG; Ekman P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1997 Jun; 72(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 9177024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children's use of a verbal-nonverbal consistency principle to infer truth and lying.
    Rotenberg KJ; Simourd L; Moore D
    Child Dev; 1989 Apr; 60(2):309-22. PubMed ID: 2924654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting lies in children and adults.
    Edelstein RS; Luten TL; Ekman P; Goodman GS
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16729205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deception detection: interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements.
    Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 135(6):603-20. PubMed ID: 11931002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. People's insight into their own behaviour and speech content while lying.
    Vrij A; Edward K; Bull R
    Br J Psychol; 2001 May; 92(Pt 2):373-89. PubMed ID: 11417787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.
    Vrij A; Mann SA; Fisher RP; Leal S; Milne R; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 17694424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: the boy-who-cried-wolf effect.
    O'Sullivan M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1316-27. PubMed ID: 15189591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When a lie becomes the truth: the effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory.
    Pickel KL
    Memory; 2004 Jan; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 15098618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-trial discrimination of truthful from deceptive responses during a game of financial risk using alpha-band MEG signals.
    Seth AK; Iversen JR; Edelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):465-76. PubMed ID: 16678444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
    Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. You want to know the truth? Then don't mimic!
    Stel M; van Dijk E; Olivier E
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 19422628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.
    Forrest KD; Woody WD; Brady SE; Batterman KC; Stastny BJ; Bruns JA
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):342-64. PubMed ID: 22315159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Behavioral cues to deception vs. topic incriminating potential in criminal confessions.
    Davis M; Markus KA; Walters SB; Vorus N; Connors B
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Dec; 29(6):683-704. PubMed ID: 16382356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A replication study of the neural correlates of deception.
    Kozel FA; Padgett TM; George MS
    Behav Neurosci; 2004 Aug; 118(4):852-6. PubMed ID: 15301611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reliability of lie detection performance.
    Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When victims don't cry: children's understandings of victimization, compliance, and subversion.
    Shaw LA; Wainryb C
    Child Dev; 2006; 77(4):1050-62. PubMed ID: 16942505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.