These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1500876)

  • 1. Global shape cannot be attended without object identification.
    Boucart M; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):785-806. PubMed ID: 1500876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of the effect of structural information and familiarity in form perception.
    Boucart M; Bonnet C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 May; 43(2):223-48. PubMed ID: 1866458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention to orientation, size, luminance, and color: attentional failure within the form domain.
    Boucart M; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Feb; 20(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 8133225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic access to object identity: attention to global information, not to particular physical dimensions, is important.
    Boucart M; Humphreys GW; Lorenceau J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):584-601. PubMed ID: 7790835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of physical and semantic information in a categorisation task of fragmented forms.
    Boucart M; Bruyer R
    Perception; 1991; 20(3):403-14. PubMed ID: 1762883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention to local form information can prevent access to semantic information.
    Murray JE; Jones C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):609-25. PubMed ID: 12047062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: evidence from object type and token discrimination.
    Hollingworth A; Henderson JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):319-43. PubMed ID: 10504886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The computation of perceptual structure from collinearity and closure: normality and pathology.
    Boucart M; Humphreys GW
    Neuropsychologia; 1992 Jun; 30(6):527-46. PubMed ID: 1641117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic versus perceptual influences of color in object recognition.
    Joseph JE; Proffitt DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Mar; 22(2):407-29. PubMed ID: 8901343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intuition in the context of object perception: intuitive gestalt judgments rest on the unconscious activation of semantic representations.
    Bolte A; Goschke T
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):608-16. PubMed ID: 18572154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Mahon BZ; Costa A; Peterson R; Vargas KA; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):503-35. PubMed ID: 17470003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local and global minima in visual completion: effects of symmetry and orientation.
    Sekuler AB
    Perception; 1994; 23(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 7800468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Object superiority: a comparison of complete and part probes.
    Davidoff J; Donnelly N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Apr; 73(3):225-43. PubMed ID: 2353588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognizing the un-real McCoy: priming and the modularity of face recognition.
    Faulkner TF; Rhodes G; Palermo R; Pellicano E; Ferguson D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 12120796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects.
    Paquet L; Merikle PM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Feb; 14(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 2964508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics.
    Nuthmann A; de Groot F; Huettig F; Olivers CNL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217051. PubMed ID: 31120948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Writing words from pictures: what representations are activated, and when?
    Bonin P; Fayol M
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):677-89. PubMed ID: 10946550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies.
    Gordon RD; Irwin DE
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Nov; 58(8):1260-77. PubMed ID: 8961836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Typicality effects in artificial categories: is there a hemisphere difference?
    Richards LG; Chiarello C
    Brain Lang; 1990 Jul; 39(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 2207623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection by color and form in vision.
    Humphreys GW; Boucart M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Feb; 23(1):136-53. PubMed ID: 9157181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.