BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1500877)

  • 1. Reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the tops of rotated objects.
    McMullen PA; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):807-20. PubMed ID: 1500877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top-bottom and front-behind decisions on rotated objects.
    Jolicoeur P; Ingleton M; Bartram L; Booth KS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Dec; 47(4):657-77. PubMed ID: 8124290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of attention in the shift from orientation-dependent to orientation-invariant identification of disoriented objects.
    Murray JE
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 7885265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rotated object identification with and without orientation cues.
    McMullen PA; Hamm J; Jolicoeur P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1995 Jun; 49(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 9183974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections.
    McMullen PA; Jolicoeur P
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 2314233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity.
    Hamm JP; McMullen PA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 9606109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orientation invariance in naming rotated objects: individual differences and repetition priming.
    McKone E; Grenfell T
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1590-603. PubMed ID: 10598472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of distance between objects and distance from the vertical axis on shape identity judgments.
    Friedman A; Pilon DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):552-64. PubMed ID: 7968551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Similarity between concurrent visual discriminations: dimensions and objects.
    Duncan J
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Oct; 54(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 8255704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociating viewpoint costs in mental rotation and object recognition.
    Hayward WG; Zhou G; Gauthier I; Harris IM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):820-5. PubMed ID: 17328379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process?
    Vecera SP; Farah MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1280-96. PubMed ID: 9401461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining the orientation of depth-rotated familiar objects.
    Niimi R; Yokosawa K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 18605505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orientation-specific effects in picture matching and naming.
    Murray JE
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Sep; 27(5):878-89. PubMed ID: 10540816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface cues reduce the latency to name rotated images of objects.
    Nicholson KG; Humphrey GK
    Perception; 2001; 30(9):1057-81. PubMed ID: 11694083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus-response compatibilities during top-bottom discriminations.
    Light P; Hamm JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Jun; 62(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 18572985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of being upright: use of environmental and viewer-centered reference frames in shape discriminations of novel three-dimensional objects.
    Friedman A; Lawrence Hall D
    Mem Cognit; 1996 May; 24(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 8718763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of perceptual reference frames in visual field asymmetries.
    Robertson LC; Lamb MR
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 3362340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flipping and spinning: spatial transformation procedures in the identification of rotated natural objects.
    Murray JE
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 9046872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of disoriented objects: effects of context of prior presentation.
    Jolicoeur P; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 2522510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.