These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1501084)
1. Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I. Koch DD; Wakil JS; Samuelson SW; Haft EA J Cataract Refract Surg; 1992 Jul; 18(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 1501084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of different keratometers with the EyeSys videokeratoscope. Vámosi P; Sohajda Z; Módis L; Vámosi G; Berta A Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Apr; 76(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 9591945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative PAR corneal topography system (CTS): comparison of its keratometric readings to manual keratometer, auto-keratometer, EyeSys Corneal Analysis system, and slit lamp PAR CTS in healthy eyes. Uçakhan OO; Sternberg G; Bodian C; Kelliher K; Asbell PA CLAO J; 2000 Jul; 26(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 10946987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the EH-270 corneal topographer with conventional keratometry. Davis LJ; Dresner MS CLAO J; 1991 Jul; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 1893543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the EyeSys model II computerized videokeratoscope. Part I: Clinical assessment. Dave T; Ruston D; Fowler C Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Sep; 75(9):647-55. PubMed ID: 9778697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three computerized videokeratoscopy systems with keratometry. Moura RC; Bowyer BL; Stevens SX; Rowsey JJ Cornea; 1998 Sep; 17(5):522-8. PubMed ID: 9756447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of keratometric values of healthy and diseased eyes measured by Javal keratometer, EyeSys, and PAR. Varssano D; Rapuano CJ; Luchs JI J Cataract Refract Surg; 1997 Apr; 23(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 9159687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of repeat videokeratography: repeatability and accuracy. Jeandervin M; Barr J Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Sep; 75(9):663-9. PubMed ID: 9778699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-assisted corneal topography: accuracy and reproducibility of the topographic modeling system. Legeais JM; Ren Q; Simon G; Parel JM Refract Corneal Surg; 1993; 9(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 8241039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contour resolution of the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System. Young JA; Talamo JH; Siegel IM J Cataract Refract Surg; 1995 Jul; 21(4):404-6. PubMed ID: 8523283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Measurement of the radius of corneal curvature with the Maloney surgical keratometer and an on-line keratometer imagery processing system]. Igarashi S; Yoshida A; Igarashi H; Kojima M Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jan; 97(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 8434540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of the inherent error in a spherically-biased corneal topography system in mapping a radially aspheric surface. Roberts C J Refract Corneal Surg; 1994; 10(2):103-11; discussion 112-6. PubMed ID: 7517283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and precision of the corneal analysis system and the topographic modeling system. Wilson SE; Verity SM; Conger DL Cornea; 1992 Jan; 11(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 1559344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of normal corneal power measurements with a keratometer, photokeratoscope, and video imaging system. Hannush SB; Crawford SL; Waring GO; Gemmill MC; Lynn MJ; Nizam A Arch Ophthalmol; 1990 Apr; 108(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 2322156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics of normal corneal topography using the EyeSys corneal analysis system. Alvi NP; McMahon TT; Devulapally J; Chen TC; Vianna MA J Cataract Refract Surg; 1997; 23(6):849-55. PubMed ID: 9292667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and precision of EyeSys and Orbscan systems on calibrated spherical test surfaces. González Pérez J; Cerviño A; Giraldez MJ; Parafita M; Yebra-Pimentel E Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Apr; 30(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 15260351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and precision of keratometry, photokeratoscopy, and corneal modeling on calibrated steel balls. Hannush SB; Crawford SL; Waring GO; Gemmill MC; Lynn MJ; Nizam A Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Aug; 107(8):1235-9. PubMed ID: 2757555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the TMS-1 and the corneal analysis system for the evaluation of abnormal corneas. Antalis JJ; Lembach RG; Carney LG CLAO J; 1993 Jan; 19(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 8453755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]