These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

873 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1501173)

  • 1. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements.
    Gorodovsky S; Zidan O
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 1501173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.
    Johnson GH; Hazelton LR; Bales DJ; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 15153849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.
    Yim NH; Rueggeberg FA; Caughman WF; Gardner FM; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 10756297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentive characteristics of dental cementation materials.
    Hunsaker KJ; Christensen GJ; Christensen RP; Cao D; Lewis RG
    Gen Dent; 1993 Nov; 41 Spec No():464-7. PubMed ID: 23087930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage on retentive strengths of luting cements for zirconia crowns.
    Ehlers V; Kampf G; Stender E; Willershausen B; Ernst CP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 25794911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seating and retention of complete crowns with a new adhesive resin cement.
    Tjan AH; Li T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 1507129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention of metal-ceramic crowns with contemporary dental cements.
    Johnson GH; Lepe X; Zhang H; Wataha JC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Sep; 140(9):1125-36. PubMed ID: 19723946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retentive strengths of cast gold crowns using glass ionomer, compomer, or resin cement.
    Ernst CP; Wenzl N; Stender E; Willershausen B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 9576325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements.
    Mendoza DB; Eakle WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):591-4. PubMed ID: 7853255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
    Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of adhesive luting agents on the marginal seating of cast restorations.
    White SN; Kipnis V
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Jan; 69(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 8455164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
    Piemjai M; Miyasaka K; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The retention of complete crowns prepared with three different tapers and luted with four different cements.
    Zidan O; Ferguson GC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jun; 89(6):565-71. PubMed ID: 12815350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns.
    Mitchell CA; Abbariki M; Orr JF
    Dent Mater; 2000 May; 16(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 10762680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.