112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15013165)
1. Chemical fingerprinting of gasoline. 2. Comparison of unevaporated and evaporated automotive gasoline samples.
Sandercock PM; Du Pasquier E
Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Feb; 140(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 15013165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chemical fingerprinting of gasoline. Part 3. Comparison of unevaporated automotive gasoline samples from Australia and New Zealand.
Sandercock PM; Du Pasquier E
Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Feb; 140(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 15013167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chemical fingerprinting of unevaporated automotive gasoline samples.
Sandercock PM; Du Pasquier E
Forensic Sci Int; 2003 Jun; 134(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12842350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individualization of gasoline samples by covariance mapping and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.
Sigman ME; Williams MR; Ivy RG
Anal Chem; 2007 May; 79(9):3462-8. PubMed ID: 17388567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classification of high-speed gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data by principal component analysis coupled with piecewise alignment and feature selection.
Watson NE; Vanwingerden MM; Pierce KM; Wright BW; Synovec RE
J Chromatogr A; 2006 Sep; 1129(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 16860329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of unevaporated gasoline samples according to their brands, by SPME-GC-MS and multivariate statistical analysis.
Monfreda M; Gregori A
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 21265832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of gasolines using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and target ion response.
Barnes AT; Dolan JA; Kuk RJ; Siegel JA
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):1018-23. PubMed ID: 15461104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chemometric analysis of diesel fuel for forensic and environmental applications.
Hupp AM; Marshall LJ; Campbell DI; Smith RW; McGuffin VL
Anal Chim Acta; 2008 Jan; 606(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 18082647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical discrimination of liquid gasoline samples from casework.
Petraco ND; Gil M; Pizzola PA; Kubic TA
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1092-101. PubMed ID: 18643865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolution of occupational exposure to environmental levels of aromatic hydrocarbons in service stations.
Periago JF; Prado C
Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Apr; 49(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 15650017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Likelihood ratio methods for forensic comparison of evaporated gasoline residues.
Vergeer P; Bolck A; Peschier LJ; Berger CE; Hendrikse JN
Sci Justice; 2014 Dec; 54(6):401-11. PubMed ID: 25498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification of gasoline data obtained by gas chromatography using a piecewise alignment algorithm combined with feature selection and principal component analysis.
Pierce KM; Hope JL; Johnson KJ; Wright BW; Synovec RE
J Chromatogr A; 2005 Nov; 1096(1-2):101-10. PubMed ID: 16301073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous determination of methyl tert-butyl ether, its degradation products and other gasoline additives in soil samples by closed-system purge-and-trap gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Rosell M; Lacorte S; Barceló D
J Chromatogr A; 2006 Nov; 1132(1-2):28-38. PubMed ID: 16904119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening Brazilian C gasoline quality: application of the SIMCA chemometric method to gas chromatographic data.
Flumignan DL; Tininis AG; Ferreira Fde O; de Oliveira JE
Anal Chim Acta; 2007 Jul; 595(1-2):128-35. PubMed ID: 17605992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of volatile substances in apples from Rosaceae family by headspace solid-phase microextraction followed by GC-qMS.
Ferreira L; Perestrelo R; Caldeira M; Câmara JS
J Sep Sci; 2009 Jun; 32(11):1875-88. PubMed ID: 19425016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The discrimination of automotive clear coats by pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and comparison of samples by a chromatogram library software.
Plage B; Berg AD; Luhn S
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 May; 177(2-3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18182262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of gasoline adulteration using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography combined to multivariate data processing.
Pedroso MP; de Godoy LA; Ferreira EC; Poppi RJ; Augusto F
J Chromatogr A; 2008 Aug; 1201(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18571187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fingerprinting and source identification of an oil spill in China Bohai Sea by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry coupled with multi-statistical analyses.
Sun P; Bao M; Li G; Wang X; Zhao Y; Zhou Q; Cao L
J Chromatogr A; 2009 Jan; 1216(5):830-6. PubMed ID: 19118832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of polybrominated biphenyls in Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) by gas chromatography coupled to electron capture negative ion tandem mass spectrometry or electron ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry.
Vetter W; Recke Rv; Symons R; Pyecroft S
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2008 Dec; 22(24):4165-70. PubMed ID: 19034893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study of the interdependency of the data sampling ratio with retention time alignment and principal component analysis for gas chromatography.
Nadeau JS; Wilson RB; Hoggard JC; Wright BW; Synovec RE
J Chromatogr A; 2011 Dec; 1218(50):9091-101. PubMed ID: 22055520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
