These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15013170)

  • 1. Exploratory study on classification and individualisation of earprints.
    Meijerman L; Sholl S; De Conti F; Giacon M; van der Lugt C; Drusini A; Vanezis P; Maat G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Feb; 140(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 15013170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the FearID earprint identification system.
    Alberink I; Ruifrok A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Mar; 166(2-3):145-54. PubMed ID: 16772109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interoperator test for anatomical annotation of earprints.
    Alberink IB; Ruifrok AC; Kieckhoefer H
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1246-54. PubMed ID: 17199610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability and reproducibility of earprint acquisition.
    Alberink I; Ruifrok A
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Mar; 53(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 18366563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ear piercing affects earprints: the role of ear piercing in human identification.
    Abbas A; Rutty GN
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Mar; 50(2):386-92. PubMed ID: 15813550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter- and intra-individual variation in applied force when listening at a surface, and resulting variation in earprints.
    Meijerman L; Nagelkerke NJ; Van Basten R; Van Der Lugt C; De Conti F; Drusini AG; Giacon M; Sholl S; Vanezis P; Maat GJ
    Med Sci Law; 2006 Apr; 46(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16683469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development of an automatic recognition system for earmark and earprint comparisons.
    Junod S; Pasquier J; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):170-8. PubMed ID: 22840281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ear witness.
    Feenstra L; van der Lugt C
    J Laryngol Otol; 2000 Jul; 114(7):497-500. PubMed ID: 10992928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Earmarks as evidence: a critical review.
    Champod IC; Evett IW; Kuchler B
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Nov; 46(6):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11714135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guilty by his fibers: suspect confession versus textile fibers reconstructed simulation.
    Suzuki S; Higashikawa Y; Sugita R; Suzuki Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):e27-32. PubMed ID: 19411148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Could earprint identification be computerised? An illustrated proof of concept paper.
    Rutty GN; Abbas A; Crossling D
    Int J Legal Med; 2005 Nov; 119(6):335-43. PubMed ID: 15703959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A test of individuality of human external ear pattern: its application in the field of personal identification.
    Purkait R; Singh P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 178(2-3):112-8. PubMed ID: 18423922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preliminary study of post mortem identification using lip prints.
    Utsuno H; Kanoh T; Tadokoro O; Inoue K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 May; 149(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 15749352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The preliminary analysis of forensic crime scene investigation].
    Fei G; Yan JJ; Qin FM
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 23(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 17330759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-sectional anthropometric study of the external ear.
    Meijerman L; van der Lugt C; Maat GJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Mar; 52(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 17316223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation into the usefulness of DNA profiling of earprints.
    Graham EA; Bowyer VL; Martin VJ; Rutty GN
    Sci Justice; 2007 Dec; 47(4):155-9. PubMed ID: 18229756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defining event reconstruction of digital crime scenes.
    Carrier BD; Spafford EH
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Nov; 49(6):1291-8. PubMed ID: 15568702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of body fluids for forensic purposes: from laboratory testing to non-destructive rapid confirmatory identification at a crime scene.
    Virkler K; Lednev IK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Jul; 188(1-3):1-17. PubMed ID: 19328638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Ear print as an identification method].
    Curiel López de Arcaute AM; Granell Navarro J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2006; 57(7):329-32. PubMed ID: 17036996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Of vulcan ears, human ears and 'earprints'.
    Wightman F; Kistler D
    Nat Neurosci; 1998 Sep; 1(5):337-9. PubMed ID: 10196517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.