BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15014150)

  • 1. Frequent false detection of positive selection by the likelihood method with branch-site models.
    Zhang J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1332-9. PubMed ID: 15014150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical properties of the branch-site test of positive selection.
    Yang Z; dos Reis M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Mar; 28(3):1217-28. PubMed ID: 21087944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution.
    Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple hypothesis testing to detect lineages under positive selection that affects only a few sites.
    Anisimova M; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 May; 24(5):1219-28. PubMed ID: 17339634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust inference of positive selection from recombining coding sequences.
    Scheffler K; Martin DP; Seoighe C
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2493-9. PubMed ID: 16895925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. False-positive selection identified by ML-based methods: examples from the Sig1 gene of the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii and the tax gene of a human T-cell lymphotropic virus.
    Suzuki Y; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 May; 21(5):914-21. PubMed ID: 15014169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of insertions, deletions, and alignment errors on the branch-site test of positive selection.
    Fletcher W; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Oct; 27(10):2257-67. PubMed ID: 20447933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional window analysis for detecting positive selection at structural regions of proteins.
    Suzuki Y
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Dec; 21(12):2352-9. PubMed ID: 15356273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of phylogenetic uncertainty on the detection of positive Darwinian selection.
    Pie MR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Dec; 23(12):2274-8. PubMed ID: 16971694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level.
    Zhang J; Nielsen R; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2472-9. PubMed ID: 16107592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive evolution after duplication of penaeidin antimicrobial peptides.
    Padhi A; Verghese B; Otta SK; Varghese B; Ramu K
    Fish Shellfish Immunol; 2007 Sep; 23(3):553-66. PubMed ID: 17449277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The roles of positive and negative selection in the molecular evolution of insect endosymbionts.
    Fry AJ; Wernegreen JJ
    Gene; 2005 Aug; 355():1-10. PubMed ID: 16039807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The comparative method rules! Codon volatility cannot detect positive Darwinian selection using a single genome sequence.
    Dagan T; Graur D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 15525696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian model comparison approach to inferring positive selection.
    Scheffler K; Seoighe C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 16120799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of branch length variation on the selection of models of molecular evolution.
    Posada D
    J Mol Evol; 2001 May; 52(5):434-44. PubMed ID: 11443347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A model of directional selection applied to the evolution of drug resistance in HIV-1.
    Seoighe C; Ketwaroo F; Pillay V; Scheffler K; Wood N; Duffet R; Zvelebil M; Martinson N; McIntyre J; Morris L; Hide W
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Apr; 24(4):1025-31. PubMed ID: 17272680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for positive selection at the pantophysin (Pan I) locus in walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma.
    Canino MF; Bentzen P
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1391-400. PubMed ID: 15084678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compound tests for the detection of hitchhiking under positive selection.
    Zeng K; Shi S; Wu CI
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Aug; 24(8):1898-908. PubMed ID: 17557886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive directional selection in the proline-rich antigen (PRA) gene among the human pathogenic fungi Coccidioides immitis, C. posadasii and their closest relatives.
    Johannesson H; Vidal P; Guarro J; Herr RA; Cole GT; Taylor JW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jun; 21(6):1134-45. PubMed ID: 15034131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A model-based approach for detecting coevolving positions in a molecule.
    Dutheil J; Pupko T; Jean-Marie A; Galtier N
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Sep; 22(9):1919-28. PubMed ID: 15944445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.