These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15015426)

  • 1. Public sector health benefits--same-sex domestic partners. Irizarry v. Board of Education of the city of Chicago, 251 F.3d 604 (7th Cir. 2001).
    Benefits Q; 2004; 20(1):62-3. PubMed ID: 15015426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. State constitutional law - same-sex relations - Supreme Court of Michigan holds that public employers may not provide healthcare benefits to same-sex domestic partners of employees. - National Pride at Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan, 748 N.W.2d 524 (Mich. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 Feb; 122(4):1263-70. PubMed ID: 19288616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A change in status: same-sex couples eligible for benefits, tax breaks.
    Carlson J
    Mod Healthc; 2013 Jul; 43(26):14-5. PubMed ID: 23878902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Domestic partnership benefits: why not offer them to same-sex partners and unmarried opposite sex partners?
    Zielinski D
    J Law Health; 1998-1999; 13(2):281-324. PubMed ID: 10947397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age discrimination--disability benefits; public sector. Arnett v. California Public Employees Retirement System, No. 98-15574, __F.3d __(9th Cir.1999).
    Benefits Q; 2001; 17(1):76-7. PubMed ID: 11258160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Federal Employees Health Benefits Program and Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program: Expiration of Coverage of Children of Same-Sex Domestic Partners; Federal Flexible Benefits Plan: Pre-Tax Payment of Health Benefits Premiums: Conforming Amendments. Final rule.
    U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
    Fed Regist; 2018 Jul; 83(134):32191-3. PubMed ID: 30020578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. All in the so-called family.
    Zeller S
    Natl J (Wash); 1998 Sep; 30(38):2180-2. PubMed ID: 10185857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recent developments in domestic partner benefits.
    Davis E
    Empl Benefits J; 1998 Mar; 23(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 10177578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Federal Employees Health Benefits and Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Programs' Coverage Exception for Children of Same-Sex Domestic Partners. Interim final rule.
    U.S. Office of Personnel Management
    Fed Regist; 2016 Dec; 81(232):86905-6. PubMed ID: 27992153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Definition of spouse under the Family and Medical Leave Act. Final rule.
    Wager and Hour Division, Department of Labor
    Fed Regist; 2015 Feb; 80(37):9989-10001. PubMed ID: 25898422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Employer health coverage for domestic partners--identifying the issues.
    Laarman LM
    Employee Relat Law J; 1993; 18(4):567-80. PubMed ID: 10123813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RUNNING MOM AND POP BUSINESSES BY THE GOOD BOOK: THE SCOPE OF RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF BUSINESS OWNERS.
    Selznick LF
    Albany Law Rev; 2015; 78(4):1353-92. PubMed ID: 27071216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex discrimination or a hard pill for employers to swallow: examining the denial of contraceptive benefits in the wake of Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co.
    Korland L
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 2002; 53(2):531-67. PubMed ID: 16506335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Despite court ruling discrimination still looms.
    Tanner C
    Oreg Nurse; 1999 Sep; 64(3):7. PubMed ID: 12024414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suspension of TRICARE-eligible's enrollment in the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program. Interim rule.
    Office of Personnel Management
    Fed Regist; 2001 Sep; 66(187):49086-8. PubMed ID: 11758591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Domestic partnership benefits at medical universities.
    O'Hanlan KA
    JAMA; 1999 Oct; 282(13):1289, 1292. PubMed ID: 10517436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Same-sex spousal benefits: a Canadian perspective.
    Smithies R; vandenHoven N
    Empl Benefits J; 1994 Dec; 19(4):29-31. PubMed ID: 10141065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pretax allotments for health insurance premiums. Final rule.
    Office of Personnel Management
    Fed Regist; 2001 Sep; 66(187):49085-6. PubMed ID: 11758590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Losing CHAMPUS bidders sue government to halt pact.
    Weissenstein E; Kenkel PJ
    Mod Healthc; 1993 Aug; 23(34):6. PubMed ID: 10127814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National and state-specific health insurance disparities for adults in same-sex relationships.
    Gonzales G; Blewett LA
    Am J Public Health; 2014 Feb; 104(2):e95-e104. PubMed ID: 24328616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.