These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15016288)

  • 1. Attention and the processing of emotional words and names: not so special after all.
    Harris CR; Pashler H
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Mar; 15(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 15016288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moray revisited: high-priority affective stimuli and visual search.
    Harris CR; Pashler HE; Coburn N
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jan; 57(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 14681002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is visual attention automatically attracted to one's own name?
    Bundesen C; Kyllingsbaek S; Houmann KJ; Jensen RM
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jul; 59(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 9259638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.
    Vitkovitch M; Cooper E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1229-40. PubMed ID: 22390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention to self-referential stimuli: can I ignore my own face?
    Devue C; Brédart S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 18413272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is the specificity of the response to the own first-name when presented as a novel in a passive oddball paradigm? An ERP study.
    Eichenlaub JB; Ruby P; Morlet D
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1447():65-78. PubMed ID: 22361115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Picture-name priming in the cerebral hemispheres.
    Coney J; Abernethy M
    Brain Lang; 1994 Aug; 47(2):300-13. PubMed ID: 7953619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stroop dilution revisited: evidence for domain-specific, limited-capacity processing.
    Roberts MA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 15709859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading.
    Scott GG; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):783-92. PubMed ID: 22329788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional load and the consciousness of one's own name.
    Lin SH; Yeh YY
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 May; 26():197-203. PubMed ID: 24762974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which words are activated during bilingual word production?
    Colomé A; Miozzo M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 20053047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-individual variability of oscillatory responses to subject's own name. A single-subject analysis.
    Höller Y; Kronbichler M; Bergmann J; Crone JS; Schmid EV; Golaszewski S; Ladurner G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Jun; 80(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 21447360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural correlates of own and close-other's name recognition: ERP evidence.
    Tacikowski P; Cygan HB; Nowicka A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():194. PubMed ID: 24772076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does word length affect speech onset latencies when producing single words?
    Damian MF; Bowers JS; Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Spalek K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):892-905. PubMed ID: 20565208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Further characterization of "subject's own name (SON) negativity," an ERP component reflecting early preattentive detection of SON.
    Tateuchi T; Itoh K; Nakada T
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 May; 8():195. PubMed ID: 25962592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of emotional salience, cognitive effort and meta-cognitive beliefs on a reality monitoring task in hallucination-prone subjects.
    Larøi F; Van der Linden M; Marczewski P
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2004 Sep; 43(Pt 3):221-33. PubMed ID: 15333229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foveal vs. parafoveal attention-grabbing power of threat-related information.
    Calvo MG; Castillo MD
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 15850162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory P3 responses to name stimuli.
    Folmer RL; Yingling CD
    Brain Lang; 1997 Feb; 56(2):306-11. PubMed ID: 9027376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Processing of own versus other names differentially affects startle reflex modification.
    Ellwanger J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 16678292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.