These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15016727)

  • 1. Centile charts I: new method of assessment for univariate reference intervals.
    Koduah M; Iles TC; Nix BJ
    Clin Chem; 2004 May; 50(5):901-6. PubMed ID: 15016727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Centile charts II: alternative nonparametric approach for establishing time-specific reference centiles and assessment of the sample size required.
    Griffiths JK; Iles TC; Koduah M; Nix AB
    Clin Chem; 2004 May; 50(5):907-14. PubMed ID: 15016724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A more flexible parametric estimation of univariate reference intervals: a new method based on the GS-distribution.
    Trujillano J; Muiño JM; March J; Sorribas A
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Apr; 379(1-2):71-80. PubMed ID: 17276425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference interval estimation: Methodological comparison using extensive simulations and empirical data.
    Daly CH; Higgins V; Adeli K; Grey VL; Hamid JS
    Clin Biochem; 2017 Dec; 50(18):1145-1158. PubMed ID: 28733190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should we maintain the 95 percent reference intervals in the era of wellness testing? A concept paper.
    Jørgensen LG; Brandslund I; Hyltoft Petersen P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 15327009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective assessment of frequency distribution histograms and consequences on reference interval accuracy for small sample sizes: A computer-simulated study.
    Coisnon C; Mitchell MA; Rannou B; Le Boedec K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2021 Sep; 50(3):427-441. PubMed ID: 34476826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity and specificity of normality tests and consequences on reference interval accuracy at small sample size: a computer-simulation study.
    Le Boedec K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2016 Dec; 45(4):648-656. PubMed ID: 27556235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametric and nonparametric methods for confidence intervals and sample size planning for win probability in parallel-group randomized trials with Likert item and Likert scale data.
    Zou G; Zou L; Qiu SF
    Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(3):418-439. PubMed ID: 36524672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reference interval estimation of small sample sizes: A methodologic comparison using a computer-simulation study.
    Le Boedec K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2019 Jun; 48(2):335-346. PubMed ID: 31228287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An appraisal of statistical procedures used in derivation of reference intervals.
    Ichihara K; Boyd JC;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Nov; 48(11):1537-51. PubMed ID: 21062226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of sample size and the traditional parametric, nonparametric, and robust methods on the establishment of reference intervals: Evidence from real world data.
    Ma C; Wang X; Xia L; Cheng X; Qiu L
    Clin Biochem; 2021 Jun; 92():67-70. PubMed ID: 33753113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On establishing reference values.
    Lumsden JH; Mullen K
    Can J Comp Med; 1978 Jul; 42(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 688072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-dependent biochemical quantities: an approach for calculating reference intervals.
    Bjerner J
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(7):707-22. PubMed ID: 17852817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of subgroup prevalences on partitioning of Gaussian-distributed reference values.
    Lahti A; Hyltoft Petersen P; Boyd JC
    Clin Chem; 2002 Nov; 48(11):1987-99. PubMed ID: 12406985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective criteria for partitioning Gaussian-distributed reference values into subgroups.
    Lahti A; Hyltoft Petersen P; Boyd JC; Fraser CG; Jørgensen N
    Clin Chem; 2002 Feb; 48(2):338-52. PubMed ID: 11805016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculating reference intervals for laboratory measurements.
    Wright EM; Royston P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1999 Jun; 8(2):93-112. PubMed ID: 10501648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical appraisal of two Box-Cox formulae for their utility in determining reference intervals by realistic simulation and extensive real-world data analyses.
    Ichihara K; Yamashita T; Kataoka H; Sato S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Dec; 242():107820. PubMed ID: 37871480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Valid analytical performance specifications for combined analytical bias and imprecision for the use of common reference intervals.
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Lund F; Fraser CG; Sandberg S; Sölétormos G
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2018 Sep; 55(5):612-615. PubMed ID: 29310466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence intervals for an effect size measure based on the Mann-Whitney statistic. Part 2: asymptotic methods and evaluation.
    Newcombe RG
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(4):559-73. PubMed ID: 16217835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.