These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1501815)

  • 1. The difficulties and costs of ethical assessment of a national research project.
    Dockerty JD; Elwood M
    N Z Med J; 1992 Aug; 105(939):311-3. PubMed ID: 1501815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency.
    Driscoll A; Currey J; Worrall-Carter L; Stewart S
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2212-20. PubMed ID: 18705740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Ethics of Human Experimentation: Reinventing the Research Ethics Board: Proceedings of a National Workshop held in Ottawa, Ontario, March 5-6, 1995.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
    NCBHR Commun; 1996; 7(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 11654527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies.
    Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Mok MT; Dodds M; Rosenthal MA
    Intern Med J; 2004 Nov; 34(11):598-603. PubMed ID: 15546452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in standards of research compensation and child assent practices: a comparison of 69 institutional review board-approved informed permission and assent forms for 3 multicenter pediatric clinical trials.
    Kimberly MB; Hoehn KS; Feudtner C; Nelson RM; Schreiner M
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):1706-11. PubMed ID: 16651328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical trials committees: how long is the protocol review and approval process in Spain? A prospective study.
    Ortega R; Dal-Ré R
    IRB; 1995; 17(4):6-9. PubMed ID: 11654218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.
    Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical decision making in committee: the role of review boards and ethics committees in health care, health policy, and medical research.
    Sass HM
    Taiwan Yi Xue Ren Wen Xue Kan; 2000 Nov; 1(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 15008173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
    van Santvoort HC; Besselink MG; Gooszen HG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2077-83. PubMed ID: 18837184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
    Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE
    IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?
    Dal-Ré R; Ortega R; Morejón E
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Jun; 31(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15923484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health researchers' views of ethics committee functioning in New Zealand.
    Paul C
    N Z Med J; 2000 Jun; 113(1111):210-4. PubMed ID: 10909934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study.
    Rosenthal MA; Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Arkell K; Dodds M;
    Intern Med J; 2005 Nov; 35(11):650-4. PubMed ID: 16248858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Unnecessary delays in ethical approval of multicentre clinical trials].
    Evers JL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2062-4. PubMed ID: 18837181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
    Dhai A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proposal for a good clinical practice directive.
    European Commission
    Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Feb; No. 135():6-11. PubMed ID: 11657249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review.
    Meslin EM
    Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent and approval by institutional review boards in published reports on clinical trials.
    Ruiz-Canela M; Martínez-González MA; Gómez-Gracia E; Fernández-Crehuet J
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Apr; 340(14):1114-5. PubMed ID: 10206829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. International guidelines for ethical review of epidemiological studies.
    Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(3-4):247-58. PubMed ID: 1779694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role?
    Freedman B
    IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.