These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1501815)

  • 21. [Ethics of medical scientific research: informed consent and the therapeutic misconception].
    de Vries MC; van Leeuwen E
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(12):679-83. PubMed ID: 18438063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan.
    Elsayed DE; Kass NE
    Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biotech and pharma face more costly clinical trials.
    Brower V
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):714. PubMed ID: 9702762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Research ethics.
    Aarons D
    West Indian Med J; 1995 Dec; 44(4):115-8. PubMed ID: 8838046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.
    Tully J; Ninis N; Booy R; Viner R
    BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10784541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The ethical conduct of health services research: a case study of 55 institutions' applications to the SUPPORT project.
    Lynn J; Johnson J; Levine RJ
    Clin Res; 1994 Feb; 42(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 8200185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
    NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Living related liver transplantation: request for an international ethics consultation from the Research Center for Surgery in Moscow.
    Emond JC; Nelson RM; Blank EL; Shapiro RS; MacKay C
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(4):602-3; discussion 603-21. PubMed ID: 7858758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethicists bemoan shortened clinical trial approval time.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 1999 Dec; 5(12):1336. PubMed ID: 10581055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ethical aspects of research involving elderly subjects: are we doing more than we say?
    Lane LW; Cassel CK; Bennett W
    J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(4):278-85; discussion 285-6. PubMed ID: 2131082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial.
    Seiler CM; Kellmeyer P; Kienle P; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP;
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Feb; 33(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 17264200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Local research ethics committees.
    Alberti KG
    BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7006):639-40. PubMed ID: 7549620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A guide to multi-centre ethics for surgical research in Australia and New Zealand.
    Boult M; Fitzpatrick K; Maddern G; Fitridge R
    ANZ J Surg; 2011 Mar; 81(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 21342383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Institutional review board variability in minimal-risk multicenter urogynecology studies.
    Harvie HS; Lowenstein L; Omotosho TB; Sanses T; Molden S; Hardy J; Brubaker L;
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 22453318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Research ethics board approval for an international thromboprophylaxis trial.
    Lutz K; Wilton K; Zytaruk N; Julien L; Hall R; Harvey J; Skrobik Y; Vlahakis N; Meade L; Matte A; Meade M; Burns K; Albert M; Cash BB; Vallance S; Klinger J; Heels-Ansdell D; Cook D;
    J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22305662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Review by a local medical research ethics committee of the conduct of approved research projects, by examination of patients' case notes, consent forms, and research records and by interview.
    Smith T; Moore EJ; Tunstall-Pedoe H
    BMJ; 1997 May; 314(7094):1588-90. PubMed ID: 9169403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Governance approval for multisite, non-interventional research: what can Harmonisation of Multi-Centre Ethical Review learn from the New South Wales experience?
    Vajdic CM; Meagher NS; Hicks SC; Faedo M; Ward RL; Pearson SA
    Intern Med J; 2012 Feb; 42(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 21241439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.
    Vaughan G; Pollock W; Peek MJ; Knight M; Ellwood D; Homer CS; Pulver LJ; McLintock C; Ho MT; Sullivan EA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 52(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 22188386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Costs and getting ethical approval deter doctors from participating in multicentre trials.
    Crooks SW; Colman SB; Campbell IA
    BMJ; 1996 Jun; 312(7047):1669. PubMed ID: 8664734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.
    Dal-Ré R; Espada J; Ortega R
    J Med Ethics; 1999 Jun; 25(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 10390685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.