366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15018209)
61. The patient's view.
Rachagan SS; Sharon K
Med J Malaysia; 2003 Mar; 58 Suppl A():86-101. PubMed ID: 14556356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Historical perspectives on law, medical malpractice, and the concept of negligence.
Wood CL
Emerg Med Clin North Am; 1993 Nov; 11(4):819-32. PubMed ID: 8404569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Medical malpractice in the new eugenics: relying on innovative tort doctrine to provide relief when gene therapy fails.
Marshall EA
Georgia Law Rev; 2001; 35(4):1277-327. PubMed ID: 12683393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. A survey of sued physicians' self-reported reactions to malpractice litigation in Iran.
Saberi SM; Sheikhazadi A; Joghataei H; Mohammadi V; Fallahian M
J Forensic Leg Med; 2009 Aug; 16(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 19573837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Medical malpractice and respondeat superior.
Regan JJ; Regan WM
South Med J; 2002 May; 95(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 12005015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Health care providers and facilities: medical malpractice and tort reform--2005. End of Year Issue Brief.
McKinley A
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2005 Dec; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 16708450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. No-fault malparactice insurance. Proximate cause and the quality of medical care.
Bush JW; Chen MM; Bush AS
West J Med; 1975 Mar; 122(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 1146300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Ethics and growing legal crisis in medicine.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Croat Med J; 2005 Oct; 46(5):724-7. PubMed ID: 16158463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Turning from damage caps to information disclosure: an alternative to tort reform.
Zeiler K
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):385-98. PubMed ID: 15742583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Medical malpractice and rhinology.
Dawson DE; Kraus EM
Am J Rhinol; 2007; 21(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 17999795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Theories of recovery for DES damage. Is tort liability the answer?
Downey AH; Gulley KG
J Leg Med; 1983 Jun; 4(2):167-200. PubMed ID: 6604118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Medical responsibility in the United Arab Emirates.
Benomran F
J Forensic Leg Med; 2010 May; 17(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 20382353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Medical malpractice: An introduction for the dental practitioner.
Blau I; Levin L
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(10):835-840. PubMed ID: 29034379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. [Medicolegal responsibility].
Cardona J; Cordier AL; Malicier D
Rev Prat; 2005 May; 55(9):933-8. PubMed ID: 16052963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Medical malpractice: impact of the crisis and effect of state tort reforms.
Mello MM; Williams CH
Synth Proj Res Synth Rep; 2006 May; (10):. PubMed ID: 22051629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Medical malpractice in American urology: 22-year national review of the impact of caps and implications for contemporary practice.
Hsieh MH; Tan AG; Meng MV
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1944-9; discussion 1949. PubMed ID: 18355843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Malpractice consult. Should you give informal medical advice?
Johnson LJ
Med Econ; 2007 Apr; 84(7):36. PubMed ID: 17494258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. [Legal liability in consultation of physicians of different specialties from the legal viewpoint].
Biermann E
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):626-32. PubMed ID: 8588435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. IS A 'NO FAULT' COMPENSATION SCHEME THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEMS OF TORT IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE?
Barker IR
Med Law; 2015 Sep; 34(1):595-602. PubMed ID: 30759953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The current status of medical malpractice countersuits.
Sokol DJ
Am J Law Med; 1985; 10(4):439-57. PubMed ID: 3911774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
