These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15018686)

  • 1. What you think is what you get: comparative evaluations of close relationships.
    Broemer P; Diehl M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Dec; 29(12):1560-9. PubMed ID: 15018686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimism in close relationships: How seeing things in a positive light makes them so.
    Srivastava S; McGonigal KM; Richards JM; Butler EA; Gross JJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(1):143-53. PubMed ID: 16834485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which thoughts count? Algorithms for evaluating satisfaction in relationships.
    Gable SL; Poore J
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1030-6. PubMed ID: 19000214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Young people's romantic attachment styles and their associations with well-being.
    Moore S; Leung C
    J Adolesc; 2002 Apr; 25(2):243-55. PubMed ID: 12069438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The personal meaning of romantic relationships for young people with psychosis.
    Redmond C; Larkin M; Harrop C
    Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2010 Apr; 15(2):151-70. PubMed ID: 20103564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Only because I love you: why people make and why they break promises in romantic relationships.
    Peetz J; Kammrath L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 May; 100(5):887-904. PubMed ID: 21244176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Positive and negative romantic relationship quality: age, familiarity, attachment and well-being as correlates of couple agreement and projection.
    Zimmer-Gembeck MJ; Ducat W
    J Adolesc; 2010 Dec; 33(6):879-90. PubMed ID: 20843545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The causal role of theories of relationships: consequences for satisfaction and cognitive strategies.
    Franiuk R; Pomerantz EM; Cohen D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Nov; 30(11):1494-507. PubMed ID: 15448312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. So far away from one's partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity.
    Dewall CN; Lambert NM; Slotter EB; Pond RS; Deckman T; Finkel EJ; Luchies LB; Fincham FD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Dec; 101(6):1302-16. PubMed ID: 21967006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits.
    Reis HT; Smith SM; Carmichael CL; Caprariello PA; Tsai FF; Rodrigues A; Maniaci MR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Aug; 99(2):311-29. PubMed ID: 20658846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The strange case of sustained dedication to an unfulfilling relationship: predicting commitment and breakup from attachment anxiety and need fulfillment within relationships.
    Slotter EB; Finkel EJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 19106079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working models of attachment and attribution processes in intimate relationships.
    Collins NL; Ford MB; Guichard AC; Allard LM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Feb; 32(2):201-19. PubMed ID: 16382082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transference and attachment: how do attachment patterns get carried forward from one relationship to the next?
    Brumbaugh CC; Fraley RC
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Apr; 32(4):552-60. PubMed ID: 16513806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship-contingent self-esteem and the ups and downs of romantic relationships.
    Knee CR; Canevello A; Bush AL; Cook A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Sep; 95(3):608-27. PubMed ID: 18729698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification and the commitment shift: accounting for gender differences in relationship illusions.
    Gagné FM; Lydon JE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Jul; 29(7):907-19. PubMed ID: 15018678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships.
    Murray SL; Holmes JG; Bellavia G; Griffin DW; Dolderman D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Apr; 82(4):563-81. PubMed ID: 11999924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpersonal patterns in close relationships: the role of sociotropy-autonomy.
    Sato T; Gonzalez MA
    Br J Psychol; 2009 May; 100(Pt 2):327-45. PubMed ID: 18652736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship perceptions and persistence: do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships?
    Arriaga XB; Reed JT; Goodfriend W; Agnew CR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1045-65. PubMed ID: 17144764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Romantic partner and friend influences on young adult cigarette smoking: comparing close others' smoking and injunctive norms over time.
    Etcheverry PE; Agnew CR
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2008 Sep; 22(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 18778125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. If you are able to control yourself, I will trust you: the role of perceived self-control in interpersonal trust.
    Righetti F; Finkenauer C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 May; 100(5):874-86. PubMed ID: 21319912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.