93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15019318)
1. Contrast sensitivity after wave front-guided LASIK.
Kaiserman I; Hazarbassanov R; Varssano D; Grinbaum A
Ophthalmology; 2004 Mar; 111(3):454-7. PubMed ID: 15019318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors.
Alió JL; Montés-Mico R
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16378639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.
Montés-Micó R; Rodríguez-Galietero A; Alió JL
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17070593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study.
Padmanabhan P; Mrochen M; Basuthkar S; Viswanathan D; Joseph R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18299062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia.
Katsanevaki VJ; Kalyvianaki MI; Kavroulaki DS; Pallikaris IG
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 17320960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia.
Igarashi A; Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Komatsu M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 148(1):164-70.e1. PubMed ID: 19375059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: in-depth statistical analysis.
Tuan KM; Liang J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Feb; 32(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 16564995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Correction and induction of high-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided LASIK and their influence on the postoperative contrast sensitivity].
Hammer T; Heynemann M; Naumann I; Duncker GI
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Mar; 223(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 16552654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Schallhorn SC; Farjo AA; Huang D; Boxer Wachler BS; Trattler WB; Tanzer DJ; Majmudar PA; Sugar A;
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1249-61. PubMed ID: 18598819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.
Kalyvianaki MI; Kymionis GD; Kounis GA; Panagopoulou SI; Grentzelos MA; Pallikaris IG
Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Contrast sensitivity function in myopic LASIK].
Yan Z; Hu J; Gu X; Sun M; Yang L
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 38(11):677-9. PubMed ID: 12487899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and the contrast sensitivity function.
Quesnel NM; Lovasik JV; Ferremi C; Boileau M; Ieraci C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1209-18. PubMed ID: 15177594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
Tobaigy FM; Ghanem RC; Sayegh RR; Hallak JA; Azar DT
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration.
Zhang J; Zhou YH; Wang NL; Li R
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Jan; 121(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 18272040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does dilated wavefront aberration measurement provide better postoperative outcome after custom LASIK?
Subbaram MV; MacRae SM
Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1813-7. PubMed ID: 16889832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical investigation of off-flap epi-LASIK for moderate to high myopia.
Wang QM; Fu AC; Yu Y; Xu CC; Wang XX; Chen SH; Yu AY
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2390-4. PubMed ID: 18515581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of pupil diameter on the relation between ocular higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Oshika T; Tokunaga T; Samejima T; Miyata K; Kawana K; Kaji Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 47(4):1334-8. PubMed ID: 16565365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glare sensitivity and optical side effects 1 year after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.
Neeracher B; Senn P; Schipper I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Aug; 30(8):1696-701. PubMed ID: 15313292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis.
Yamane N; Miyata K; Samejima T; Hiraoka T; Kiuchi T; Okamoto F; Hirohara Y; Mihashi T; Oshika T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Nov; 45(11):3986-90. PubMed ID: 15505046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Chung SH; Lee IS; Lee YG; Lee HK; Kim EK; Yoon G; Seo KY
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 16765794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
